AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated whether self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are more effective than plastic stents in managing biliary drainage for patients with jaundice due to periampullary tumors.
  • A total of 92 patients were randomly assigned to receive either SEMS or plastic stents, with the primary outcome being the level of bacterial growth in bile at the time of surgery.
  • Results showed no significant differences in bacterial levels or surgical difficulty, but patients with plastic stents experienced higher rates of stent dysfunction and were more likely to have postoperative complications, although these differences were not statistically significant.

Article Abstract

Background And Study Aims: Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with periampullary tumors and jaundice has been popularized to improve the quality of life and minimize the risks associated with subsequent radical surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible superiority of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) over plastic stents, by comparing the amount of bacteria in intraoperatively collected bile and using this variable as a proxy for the efficacy of the respective biliary drainage modalities.

Patients And Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 92 patients with obstructive jaundice were enrolled; 45 were allocated to the plastic stent group and 47 to the SEMS group. The primary outcome was the extent and magnitude of biliary bacterial growth at the time of surgical exploration. Secondary outcomes were: macroscopic grading of inflammation of the stented bile ducts, occurrence of adverse events after stenting, stent dysfunction, recognized surgical complexities, and incidence of postoperative complications.

Results:  The patients were well matched regarding clinical and disease-specific characteristics. At surgery, there were no group differences in the bacterial amount and composition of the bile cultures or the perceived difficulty of surgical dissection. During the preoperative biliary drainage period, more instances of stent dysfunction requiring stent replacement were recorded in the plastic stent group (19 % vs. 0 %;  = 0.03). Postoperative complications in patients who underwent curative surgery were more common in patients with plastic stents (72 % vs. 52 %), among which clinically significant leakage from the pancreatic anastomoses seemed to predominate (12 % vs. 3.7 %); however, none of these differences in postoperative adverse events reached statistical significance.

Conclusion:  This randomized clinical study was unable to demonstrate any superiority of SEMS in the efficacy of preoperative bile drainage, as assessed by the amount of bacteria in the intraoperatively collected bile. However, some data in favor of SEMS were observed among the clinical secondary outcomes variables (preoperative stent exchange rates) without increases in local inflammatory reactions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5585071PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-110565DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biliary drainage
16
preoperative biliary
12
randomized clinical
12
self-expandable metal
8
metal stents
8
patients periampullary
8
periampullary tumors
8
clinical study
8
plastic stents
8
amount bacteria
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!