AI Article Synopsis

  • Wildlife health is crucial for monitoring zoonotic pathogens, and a study assessed the presence of Brucella spp., Coxiella burnetii, and Leptospira spp. in free-ranging red deer in central Spain.
  • The study found no antibodies for Brucella and Coxiella, but Leptospira spp. seroprevalence increased from 9.4% to 38.5% over five years, predominantly in older deer.
  • While red deer do not appear to maintain Brucella and C. burnetii, the rise in Leptospira spp. could pose a risk to people in contact with these animals, necessitating further investigation into the potential role of wild boar in disease transmission

Article Abstract

Wildlife health is of interest for public and animal health because wild animals have been identified as important sentinels for the surveillance for zoonotic pathogens. This work investigated Brucella spp., Coxiella burnetii, and Leptospira spp. infection seroprevalence in a free-ranging red deer population. The study was conducted in a fenced reserve with controlled hunting activity in central Spain with animals that did not have any contact with livestock. Sampling was performed at two time points before and 5 years after the implementation of new management measures, including a reduction in the red deer population in the reserve. In addition, the presence of Leptospira DNA was tested in placental and fetal samples from seropositive pregnant animals. Antibodies against Brucella and Coxiella were not detected in any sample. The seroprevalence of Leptospira was 9.4% (13/137) in the first sampling for serovars Canicola and Panama. Five years later, the prevalence rose to 38.5% (97/252) with Pomona, the only serovar detected. Animals older than 2 years (50%; 70/140) were more likely to be Pomona seropositive than animals ≤2 years old (25.2%; 27/107; p < 0.001). Leptospira DNA was not detected in any sample tested. In conclusion, wild red deer in this area without contact with livestock seem not to play an important role in Brucella spp. and C. burnetii maintenance. The high seroprevalence of Leptospira spp. serogroup Pomona could indicate a risk for people with narrow contact with these animals, but the carrier status was not assessed. Consequently, it is unknown if red deer would represent a risk for human infection. Considering that wild boar could be the source of infection to red deer, the role of wild boar in the spread of leptospirosis and the risk for human infection should be investigated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2016.2105DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

red deer
12
fenced reserve
8
contact livestock
8
deer population
8
animals
5
seroprevalence leptospirosis
4
leptospirosis brucellosis
4
brucellosis fever
4
fever wild
4
wild red
4

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!