Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Persons Without Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Ann Intern Med

From University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland; University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; VA Medical Center, Washington, DC; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; VA Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico; VA Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee; and Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Published: September 2017

Background: The public health significance of the reported higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering is unclear.

Objective: To examine the effects of intensive SBP lowering on kidney and cardiovascular outcomes and contrast its apparent beneficial and adverse effects.

Design: Subgroup analyses of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01206062).

Setting: Adults with high blood pressure and elevated cardiovascular risk.

Participants: 6662 participants with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Intervention: Random assignment to an intensive or standard SBP goal (120 or 140 mm Hg, respectively).

Measurements: Differences in mean eGFR during follow-up (estimated with a linear mixed-effects model), prespecified incident CKD (defined as a >30% decrease in eGFR to a value <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular event, with surveillance every 3 months.

Results: The difference in adjusted mean eGFR between the intensive and standard groups was -3.32 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI, -3.90 to -2.74 mL/min/1.73 m2) at 6 months, was -4.50 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CI, -5.16 to -3.85 mL/min/1.73 m2) at 18 months, and remained relatively stable thereafter. An incident CKD event occurred in 3.7% of participants in the intensive group and 1.0% in the standard group at 3-year follow-up, with a hazard ratio of 3.54 (CI, 2.50 to 5.02). The corresponding percentages for the composite of death or cardiovascular event were 4.9% and 7.1% at 3-year follow-up, with a hazard ratio of 0.71 (CI, 0.59 to 0.86).

Limitation: Long-term data were lacking.

Conclusion: Intensive SBP lowering increased risk for incident CKD events, but this was outweighed by cardiovascular and all-cause mortality benefits.

Primary Funding Source: National Institutes of Health.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8545525PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M16-2966DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
16
systolic blood
12
effects intensive
8
intensive systolic
8
kidney cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular outcomes
8
kidney disease
8
sbp lowering
8
blood
4
pressure
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!