A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The utility of measuring tear film break-up time for prescribing contact lenses. | LitMetric

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical value of non-invasive keratograph tear film breakup time (NIKBUT) in the assessment of pre-corneal and pre-lens tear film quality for prescribing contact lenses (CLs).

Methods: Forty-six subjects aged 25.5±4.3 (mean±standard deviation) years were recruited. Visual acuity (VA), anterior eye health checks and NIKBUT were evaluated. On the following day, subjects were fitted with a daily Silicon Hydrogel (SiHy) CL in one eye and a Hydrogel (Hy) CL in the other. After four hours one material for both eyes was chosen based on a qualitative analysis which included VA, CL fitting and comfort. Information about the first and the mean NIKBUT was then contrasted against the prescription decision.

Results: Thirty-four subjects were fitted with SiHy and twelve with Hy CL. No statistically significant differences were found for both NIKBUT parameters between left and right eye at baseline (p=0.38 and p=0.50, respectively) and post four hours of CL wear (p=0.61 and p=0.06). The chosen lens did not always correspond to longer NIKBUT. In 39.1% and 34.8% of cases (i.e., 18 and 16 out of 46), there was a match between prescription decision and the first and the mean NIKBUT results, respectively.

Conclusions: Although there is no evidence whether tear film surface quality measurement has a superior diagnostic values compared to other traditional clinical measures used in practice, NIKBUT measurements have provided additional information that could be of interest during CL fit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2017.08.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tear film
16
prescribing contact
8
contact lenses
8
subjects fitted
8
nikbut
7
utility measuring
4
tear
4
measuring tear
4
film
4
film break-up
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!