A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Fully Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Applying the Hybrid Algorithm: Insights From RECHARGE Registry. | LitMetric

Fully Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Percutaneous Intervention of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions Applying the Hybrid Algorithm: Insights From RECHARGE Registry.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv

From the Department of Cardiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands (E.J.B., C.Z., P.A.); Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium (J.M., J.D.); Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hasselt, Belgium (J.M.); Department of Cardiology, Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste, Grenoble, France (B.F.); Department of Cardiology, Clinique de Marignane, France (A.A.); Department of Cardiology, Arnault Tzanck Institut, St Laurent du Var, France (A.A.); Department of Cardiology, Belfast City Hospital, United Kingdom (S.W., C.G.H.); Department of Cardiology, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (J.C.S.); Department of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.K.); Department of Cardiology, Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises, Nantes, France (E.B.); Department of Cardiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Belgium (P.K.); Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (A.J.B., M.E.); Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (A.J.B., M.E.); Department of Cardiology, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom (D.S.); Department of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom (M.B.M.); Department of Cardiology, Nottingham University Hospital, United Kingdom (W.H.T.S.); Department of Cardiology, Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon Hospital, United Kingdom (P.K.); Department of Cardiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, United Kingdom (J.I.); Department of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (E.J.S.); and Department of Cardiology, Bristol Heart Institute, United Kingdom (J.W.S.).

Published: September 2017

Background: Small observational studies demonstrate the feasibility of transradial approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of the current study is to assess technical success, complication rates, and procedural efficiency in fully transradial approach (fTRA) and transfemoral approach (TFA) in a large prospective European registry adopting the hybrid algorithm for CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (Registry of CrossBoss and Hybrid Procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom, RECHARGE registry).

Methods And Results: We analyzed 1253 CTO percutaneous coronary intervention procedures performed according to the hybrid protocol in 17 European centers, comparing fTRA (single or biradial access) and TFA (single or bifemoral or combined radial and femoral access). fTRA was applied in 306 (24%) and TFA in 947 (76%) cases. The average Japanese CTO score was 2.1±1.2 in fTRA and 2.3±1.1 in TFA (=0.06). Technical success was achieved in 85% in fTRA and 86% in TFA (=0.51). Technical success was comparable for fTRA and TFA in different Japanese CTO score subgroups after multivariable analysis and after propensity adjustment. In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events occurred in 2.0% in fTRA and 2.9% in TFA (=0.40). Major access site bleeding occurred in 0.3% in fTRA and 0.5% in TFA (=0.66). fTRA compared with TFA had similar procedural duration (80 minutes [54-120 minutes] versus 90 minutes [60-121 minutes]; =0.07), similar radiation dose (dose area product 89 Gray×cm [52-163 Gray×cm] versus 101 Gray×cm [59-171 Gray×cm]; =0.06), and lower contrast agent use (200 mL [150-310 mL] versus 250 mL [200-350 mL]; <0.01).

Conclusions: fTRA CTO percutaneous coronary intervention is a valid alternative to TFA with a high rate of success, low complication rates, and no decrease in procedural efficiency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005255DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cto percutaneous
12
percutaneous coronary
12
coronary intervention
12
technical success
12
ftra
9
tfa
9
fully transradial
8
transfemoral approach
8
chronic total
8
hybrid algorithm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!