Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hook of the hamate excision for fracture in a large cohort of patients to better understand recovery time and complications.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with surgical excision for hook of the hamate fractures at 2 different centers. We collected information on demographics, clinical presentation, and postoperative complications. Continuous outcome variables included time to surgery, return to play, and return to activity.
Results: Our cohort of 81 patients had a median age of 22 years and was composed of 74 athletes including 57 baseball players and 8 golfers. The median time to return to play was 6 weeks (range, 1-36 weeks) after surgery; 11 patients (14%) had a return at 12 weeks or longer. Seventy-eight patients returned to preinjury activity levels. Twelve patients with a full recovery continued to experience some level of intermittent, nonspecific pain in the affected hand, although this was not severe enough to require additional treatment. We observed a 25% incidence of postoperative complications with the majority consisting of transient ulnar nerve dysfunction. Complications were more common among nonathletes, those presenting with nonunions, and those experiencing longer intervals between injury and surgery.
Conclusions: In most cases, surgical excision as treatment for hook of the hamate fractures is safe and allows a relatively rapid return to play. However, we found a higher incidence of complications, including transient ulnar nerve dysfunction, than has been previously reported. In addition, there is a group of patients with delayed return to play and continued discomfort after surgery. These findings should inform the discussion with surgical candidates.
Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic IV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626650 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.108 | DOI Listing |
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.
Background: Continued advancements in cartilage surgery and an accumulating body of evidence warrants a contemporary synthesis of return to sport (RTS) outcomes to provide updated prognostic data and to better understand treatment response.
Purpose: To perform an updated systematic review of RTS in athletes after knee cartilage restoration surgery.
Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Dean RARE/ORIC, Islamic International Medical College, RIPHAH university, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Background: The professional development of faculty members is essential for improving the quality of education. Faculty development programs play a very vital role in continued professional development of faculty. Reflective Critique writing is an important tool for evaluation of faculty development programs, as it provides opportunities for self-reflection, self-critique and self-awareness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin J Sport Med
January 2025
Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, Florida.
Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the original peer-reviewed studies on athletes who developed myocarditis after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection or after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Both entities likely have an immunologic component. We discuss elite, professional, college, and adolescent athletes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Latarjet procedure is a successful treatment for anterior shoulder instability with less than 5% having redislocations - revision surgery and prior surgery having been shown to be significant risk factors for recurrence. Approximately 90% of athletes return to play after Latarjet, comparable to arthroscopic Bankart repair. Patients may be physically unable to return to play, which may be due to persistent pain, apprehension, or weakness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKnee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
January 2025
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Purpose: To compare football players who have undergone one anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with those who have undergone a subsequent ACLR (revision or contralateral) regarding (1) demographics, (2) football-related factors and (3) injury-specific data.
Methods: Players who voluntarily completed a football-specific questionnaire available at the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry website between April 2017 and September 2020 at the time of their primary ACL injury were included in the study. The questionnaire covered demographics, football-related activities and injury-specific factors.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!