A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Utility of Sox10 labeling in metastatic breast carcinomas. | LitMetric

Utility of Sox10 labeling in metastatic breast carcinomas.

Hum Pathol

Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA; Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2017

Sox10 labeling by immunohistochemistry has been primarily reported in tumors of neural crest origin, such as nerve sheath tumors and melanoma. However, Sox10 also labels primary breast carcinomas, particularly those with the basal-like, triple-negative phenotype. However, the utility of Sox10 labeling in metastatic breast carcinomas has not been reported. Here, we prospectively evaluated Sox10 labeling in surgically resected metastatic breast carcinomas from 26 patients sampled on tissue microarrays. In this cohort, Sox10 labeling was seen in 3 metastatic breast carcinomas (12%), all of which were grade III, triple-negative ductal carcinomas metastatic to the brain (n=2) or lung (n=1). Overall, 38% of triple-negative metastases were Sox10 positive, compared to 0% of estrogen receptor (ER) or human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) metastases (P=.045). In addition, we retrospectively reviewed the use of Sox10 immunohistochemistry in metastatic carcinomas in our clinical practice. We identified 21 cases from January 2012-July 2017 in which Sox10 immunohistochemistry was ordered on clinical sign-out in the work-up of a metastatic carcinoma as being of possible breast origin. Overall, Sox10 labeled 57% (n=12) of all evaluated metastatic carcinomas. All of the Sox10 tumors were ER, such that 71% of ER carcinomas were Sox10 in comparison to 0% of ER carcinomas (P=0.049). In conclusion, the differential diagnosis of a Sox10 malignancy of unknown origin should not be limited to metastatic melanoma. Sox10 labeling is seen in a subset of metastatic triple-negative breast carcinomas, supporting its use as a marker of breast origin in this setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.08.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sox10 labeling
24
breast carcinomas
24
metastatic breast
16
sox10
13
labeling metastatic
12
carcinomas sox10
12
carcinomas
11
metastatic
10
utility sox10
8
breast
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!