AI Article Synopsis

  • Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, but its incidence and impact in patients undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) is less understood, particularly among those with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma.
  • A study retrospectively analyzed 324 ASCT cases at the American University of Beirut Medical Center, examining the differences in CMV reactivation rates and outcomes between patients with MM and Lymphoma, focusing on various survival metrics and risk factors for reactivation.
  • Results showed a cumulative CMV reactivation rate of 16%, with higher incidences in the MM (22%) and Non-Hodg

Article Abstract

Background: Cytomegalovirus reactivation is often diagnosed in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and therefore could lead to CMV-related disease, involving many organs in these immunocompromised patients. In contrast, few studies investigated CMV reactivation and end-organ disease in patients undergoing Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) since they are considered at low risk for both reactivation and disease.

Objectives: The primary outcome of the analysis was to understand the difference in incidence of CMV reactivation between MM and Lymphoma patients. Secondary outcomes included the difference between MM and Lymphoma patients when considering the effect of CMV reactivation on transplant related mortality (TRM) overall survival (OS) progression free survival (PFS), risk factors for reactivation, and median time to reactivation.

Study Design: In this report, we retrospectively compared the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of CMV reactivation in adult patients with Myeloma (MM) and Lymphoma undergoing ASCT at the American university of Beirut Medical Center in Lebanon (AUBMC). A total of 324 consecutive ASCT were performed between January 2005 and March 2016. Serial weekly monitoring for CMV quantification was done using a quantitative PCR, starting from transplantation until the hospital discharge and afterwards based on the clinical symptoms in cases of clinical suspicion of reactivation after discharge from the hospital.

Results: The cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was 16% (n=53) with a median time of 16 (range, 4-242) days after ASCT. The incidence of reactivation was significantly higher in the MM (22%) and NHL (20%) groups, when compared to the HL (4%) (P=0.001). There was a higher incidence of CMV reactivation according to age (≥50 vs ≤50 years) with higher incidence in the older population 24% vs 10% respectively (p=0.0043). The mean time to CMV reactivation was significantly higher in the NHL group with a mean of 53.7days when compared to the HL and MM groups with mean 19.75days and 12.66 (range, 4-34) days respectively (P=0.003). Twenty-two patients (76%) and three patients (75%) patients required specific antiviral therapy in the MM group and HL groups respectively; which was significantly higher (P<0.001) then the NHL group with 13 (65%) patients requiring specific antiviral therapy. Five patients (1.5%) developed CMV disease at a median of 60days (range, 7-107) post ASCT: there was significant difference in the mean-time to reactivation based on disease type MM versus lymphoma 10 versus 33days (P=0.007). In multivariate analysis, a higher age was associated with an increased risk of CMV reactivation; MM and NHL had higher risk of CMV reactivation when compared to HL, and progressive disease at transplant was associated with increased risk of CMV reactivation. After a median follow-up of 21.5 months (range: 1-125), there was no significant impact on PFS, however there was significant decrease in OS of lymphoma patients who had CMV reactivation when compared to those without CMV reactivation (204 and 112days respectively P=0.045). TRM increased from 1.1% in patients with no CMV reactivation to 13% in patients with CMV reactivation (P=0.003).

Conclusion: Our data suggests that CMV reactivation is not uncommon in ASCT recipients and may contribute to increase TRM. MM patients may have a higher incidence, of CMV reactivation with more anti-viral treatment requirements when compared to lymphoma patients, especially in older population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cmv reactivation
28
reactivation
12
incidence cmv
12
patients
9
cytomegalovirus reactivation
8
reactivation lymphoma
8
patients undergoing
8
undergoing autologous
8
autologous peripheral
8
peripheral blood
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!