[Efficacy comparison of the laparoscopic total extraperitoneal prosthetic and the Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy for inguinal hernia].

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China.

Published: August 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal prosthetic (TEP) versus Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy for treating inguinal hernias in 158 patients.
  • Both surgical groups had similar baseline characteristics and no significant complications, with the operative times being comparable.
  • However, the TEP group showed advantages with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative recovery time, and a reduced length of hospital stay compared to the Lichtenstein group.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety between laparoscopic total extraperitoneal prosthetic (TEP) and Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy in the treatment of inguinal hernia (IH).

Methods: Clinical data of 158 IH patients at our hospital from October 2015 to October 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Among 158 patients, 85 patients underwent TEP (TEP group), and 73 underwent Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy(Lichtenstein group). Patients of TEP group received general anesthesia. The space between suprapubic space and iliac fossa was separated with attention to protect the spermatic cord during the operation so as to avoid excessive separation. When the patch was placed, the internal margin exceeded the contralateral pubic tubercle, the lateral margin reached the anterior superior iliac spine, there was at least 2 cm overlap between the superior margin and the joint tendon, the lower margin was inserted into the suprapubic bladder space(Retzius space), and the lateral lower margin was at least 6 cm to internal ring. Lichtenstein group received local anesthesia or continuous epidural anesthesia and all underwent routine Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy. Operative time, postoperative conditions and recurrence were compared between two groups.

Results: Among these 158 patients, 129 were male and 29 were female, with an age ranging from 26 to 75 years (median 42 years). Baseline data were not significantly different between two groups(all P>0.05). There was no perioperative death and serious complications in two groups. The difference was not statistically significant in operative time[(47.6±5.4) minutes vs. (48.9±6.3) minutes, t=0.238, P=1.024]. But TEP group was better than Lichtenstein group in terms of intraoperative blood loss [(7.53±2.31) ml vs. (11.41±4.49) ml, t=5.783, P=0.032], postoperative bedtime [(1.25±0.32) days vs. (2.83±0.52) days, t=5.294, P=0.041], postoperative hospital stay [(2.38±1.14) days vs. (3.46±1.81) days, t=5.482, P=0.037], and postoperative pain score (1.27±0.47 vs. 3.42±1.93, t=5.639, P=0.034). Follow-up was 12-16 months (median 10 months). In TEP and Lichtenstein group after operation, incision infection occurred in both 1 case, edema of the scrotum or labia minora developed in 2 patients and 3 cases respectively, chronic pain was found in one and 2 cases respectively. The patients were followed up for 5 to 16 months(median 10 months), and recurrences was observed in 1 case both in TEP group and Lichtenstein group respectively.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal prosthetic is safe and effective in the treatment of inguinal hernia, which is better than Lichtenstein herniorrhaphy in fast recovery, less trauma and more comfort, and worthy of clinical promotion.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lichtenstein herniorrhaphy
16
tep group
16
lichtenstein group
16
laparoscopic total
12
total extraperitoneal
12
extraperitoneal prosthetic
12
158 patients
12
lichtenstein
9
group
9
tep lichtenstein
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!