A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a ceramic based sealer and MTA as root-end filling materials - An study. | LitMetric

Comparative evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a ceramic based sealer and MTA as root-end filling materials - An study.

J Clin Exp Dent

Professor, Department of Conservative dentistry and Endodontics, Al Qaseem private colleges, College of dentistry, Buraydah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Published: July 2017

Background: The present study was aimed to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of two endodontic root-end filling materials namely, iRoot SP (ceramic based) and ProRoot MTA using the bacterial leakage system.

Material And Methods: A total of fifty recently extracted, single rooted teeth with a single straight canal were selected for the study. The teeth were chemo mechanically prepared. The apical 3mm of the root was resected and root end cavities were prepared. The teeth were randomly divided into two groups of twenty teeth each for the experimental root end filling materials namely, iRoot SP and ProRoot MTA. A two-chamber model was constructed using pippeter tips and plastic vials. The pipetter tips with the teeth were suspended in these caps and the entire assembly was reattached to the vial. The upper chamber was seeded with. An Enterococci-selective broth was used in the lower chamber. Leakage was assessed for 90 days and compared using survival statistics.

Results: The ProRoot MTA filled root end samples leaked within 30-72 days. The iRoot SP filled root end samples leaked within 51-69 days.

Conclusions: Under the parameters of this study, it can be concluded that all the tested materials showed significant apical sealing ability as root-end filling materials over a period of 90 days. iRoot SP exhibited the most effective apical sealing ability as compared to ProRoot MTA. Apical sealing ability, Bacterial leakage, iRoot SP, ProRoot MTA, Root-end filling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5549589PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53903DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

apical sealing
20
sealing ability
20
proroot mta
20
root-end filling
16
filling materials
16
ceramic based
8
mta root-end
8
materials iroot
8
bacterial leakage
8
iroot proroot
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!