A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Increasing Medical Student Exposure to IR through Integration of IR into the Gross Anatomy Course. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how a lecture series on interventional radiology (IR) affected medical students' knowledge and interest before and after the series.
  • Four elective IR lectures were conducted alongside gross anatomy dissection, with surveys given to assess student knowledge and interest levels.
  • Results showed significant improvements in knowledge about IR and increased career interest among students who attended the lectures compared to those who did not, indicating that integrating IR education into the curriculum can effectively engage students.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare medical student knowledge of and interest in interventional radiology (IR) before and after the integration of an IR lecture series within the gross anatomy course.

Materials And Methods: Four elective IR lectures were scheduled to coincide with the relevant anatomy dissection curriculum. Anonymous surveys were distributed to 146 students before and after the lectures regarding students' knowledge of and interest in IR, responsibilities of an IR physician, and IR training pathways. Those who did not attend served as controls.

Results: Response rates were 67% (n = 98) in the prelecture group, 55% (n = 22) in the group who attended the lecture, and 28% (n = 30) in the control group. A total of 73% of the prelecture group reported little knowledge of IR compared with other specialties. This decreased to 27% in those who attended the lecture (P < .001). A total of 32% of those who attended believed they had more knowledge of IR than any other specialty, compared with 7% of controls (P value not significant) and 2% of the prelecture group (P < .001). Those in attendance could name a significantly greater number of IR procedures (mean, 1.82) than the prelecture group (mean, 0.57; P < .001). A total of 64% of those who attended would consider a career in IR, compared with 24% in the prelecture group and 33% in the control group (P < .05). A total of 68% of those who attended had knowledge of the IR residency, compared with 5% in the prelecture group and 33% in the control group (P < .05).

Conclusions: Integration of IR education into the gross anatomy course proved to be a highly effective way of teaching preclinical students about IR and generating interest in the field.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.040DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prelecture group
12
medical student
8
gross anatomy
8
knowledge interest
8
attended lecture
8
group
5
increasing medical
4
student exposure
4
exposure integration
4
integration gross
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!