Direct stenting versus balloon predilation: Jury is still out.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

Department of Interventional Cardiology and Endovascular Therapeutics, Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Published: August 2017

Compared to balloon predilation, direct stenting (DS) shortens procedural time and reduces radiation and contrast exposure. A meta-analysis that included 7 studies comparing these 2 strategies revealed lower adverse event rate with DS. Studies included in the present meta-analysis were mostly observational and utilized first generation drug-eluting stent. Patient and lesion selection may explain these positive results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

direct stenting
8
balloon predilation
8
stenting versus
4
versus balloon
4
predilation jury
4
jury compared
4
compared balloon
4
predilation direct
4
stenting shortens
4
shortens procedural
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!