AI Article Synopsis

  • A mixture of venoms from three snake species is used to create the Central American antivenom (PoliVal-ICP) and this study explores how these venoms affect each other's antibody responses.
  • Results show limited cross-reactivity and cross-neutralization among the venoms, which supports their combined use for antivenom production.
  • The findings indicate that the immunization strategy can be refined to enhance antibody responses by adjusting the timing and composition of venom mixtures administered to horses.

Article Abstract

A mixture of the venoms of Bothrops asper, Crotalus simus and Lachesis stenophrys is used as immunogen to produce the polyspecific Central American antivenom (PoliVal-ICP). In this work, we studied the ability of each of these venoms to modulate the antibody response induced by the other two venoms included in the immunization mixture. For that, equine monospecific, bispecific and polyspecific antivenoms were prepared and compared regarding their ability to neutralize the phospholipase A, coagulant and lethal activities of each venom, and their anti-venom antibodies concentration. Results indicate that there is low cross-reactivity and cross-neutralization between venoms of B. asper, C. simus and L. stenophrys, hence justifying the use of all of them as immunogens for the production of the Central American antivenom. It was also found that the venom of B. asper reduces the anti-crotalic response while the venom of C. simus does not affect the anti-bothropic response. On the other hand, the venoms of B. asper and C. simus increase the anti-lachesic response, and L. stenoprhys venom reduced both the anti-bothropic and anti-crotalic responses. On the basis of these results, the immunization strategy can be adjusted by preventing or taking advantage of cross-immunomodulation between venoms, in order to maximize the antibody response towards all venoms. Immune responses can be improved by injecting horses with several immunogen mixtures, composed by one or two of the three venoms, and administering them at different times during the immunization, eventually generating a high titer against the three venoms. Our results suggest that addressing the issue of immunomodulation by venoms might improve antivenom manufacture worldwide.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.08.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

venoms
11
cross-immunomodulation venoms
8
bothrops asper
8
asper crotalus
8
crotalus simus
8
simus lachesis
8
lachesis stenophrys
8
central american
8
american antivenom
8
antibody response
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!