Learning effects of dynamic postural control by auditory biofeedback versus visual biofeedback training.

Gait Posture

Department of Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, N12-W5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0812, Japan. Electronic address:

Published: October 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the effects of augmented sensory biofeedback (BF) on dynamic postural control, comparing visual and auditory feedback methods for motor learning.
  • Eighteen healthy young adults participated, with one group receiving visual BF and the other auditory BF while attempting to align their center of pressure (COP) with a moving target.
  • Results showed that the auditory BF group performed better in maintaining posture without feedback, indicating that auditory feedback may enhance proprioceptive integration and overall motor learning more effectively than visual feedback.

Article Abstract

Augmented sensory biofeedback (BF) for postural control is widely used to improve postural stability. However, the effective sensory information in BF systems of motor learning for postural control is still unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the learning effects of visual versus auditory BF training in dynamic postural control. Eighteen healthy young adults were randomly divided into two groups (visual BF and auditory BF). In test sessions, participants were asked to bring the real-time center of pressure (COP) in line with a hidden target by body sway in the sagittal plane. The target moved in seven cycles of sine curves at 0.23Hz in the vertical direction on a monitor. In training sessions, the visual and auditory BF groups were required to change the magnitude of a visual circle and a sound, respectively, according to the distance between the COP and target in order to reach the target. The perceptual magnitudes of visual and auditory BF were equalized according to Stevens' power law. At the retention test, the auditory but not visual BF group demonstrated decreased postural performance errors in both the spatial and temporal parameters under the no-feedback condition. These findings suggest that visual BF increases the dependence on visual information to control postural performance, while auditory BF may enhance the integration of the proprioceptive sensory system, which contributes to motor learning without BF. These results suggest that auditory BF training improves motor learning of dynamic postural control.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postural control
20
dynamic postural
12
motor learning
12
visual auditory
12
visual
9
learning effects
8
postural
8
auditory
8
auditory training
8
postural performance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!