AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients in intensive care often experience severe loss of lean body mass due to critical illnesses and currently have no effective treatments, with ghrelin being tested as a potential solution.
  • In a study with male Wistar rats, those given ghrelin after inducing peritonitis showed increased food intake and body mass, but no improvement in muscle mass or strength.
  • The findings suggest that while ghrelin can help with weight gain and recovery of overall body mass, it doesn't affect muscle health, indicating the need for further research on how to enhance muscle recovery alongside ghrelin treatment.

Article Abstract

Background: Patients with multiple injuries or sepsis requiring intensive care treatment invariably develop a catabolic state with resultant loss of lean body mass, for which there are currently no effective treatments. Recovery can take months and mortality is high. We hypothesise that treatment with the orexigenic and anti-inflammatory gastric hormone, ghrelin may attenuate the loss of body mass following critical illness and improve recovery.

Methods: Male Wistar rats received an intraperitoneal injection of the fungal cell wall derivative zymosan to induce a prolonged peritonitis and consequent critical illness. Commencing at 48h after zymosan, animals were randomised to receive a continuous infusion of ghrelin or vehicle control using a pre-implanted subcutaneous osmotic mini-pump, and continued for 10 days.

Results: Zymosan peritonitis induced significant weight loss and reduced food intake with a nadir at Day 2 and gradual recovery thereafter. Supra-physiologic plasma ghrelin levels were achieved in the treated animals. Ghrelin-treated rats ate more food and gained more body mass than controls. Ghrelin increased adiposity and promoted carbohydrate over fat metabolism, but did not alter total body protein, muscle strength nor muscle morphology. Muscle mass and strength remained significantly reduced in all zymosan-treated animals, even at ten days post-insult.

Conclusions: Continuous infusion of ghrelin increased body mass and food intake, but did not increase muscle mass nor improve muscle function, in a long-term critical illness recovery model. Further studies with pulsatile ghrelin delivery or additional anabolic stimuli may further clarify the utility of ghrelin in survivors of critical illness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5552127PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182659PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

critical illness
20
body mass
16
muscle function
8
function long-term
8
continuous infusion
8
infusion ghrelin
8
food intake
8
ghrelin increased
8
muscle mass
8
ghrelin
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!