AI Article Synopsis

  • SB4 (Benepali, Brenzys) is a biosimilar to etanercept, showing similar efficacy and safety in a 52-week study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), followed by a 48-week open-label extension.
  • In the extension phase, 126 patients continued with SB4 and 119 switched from etanercept to SB4, with American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates remaining high and comparable between the groups.
  • Overall, SB4 was effective and well-tolerated over 2 years, with no notable risks identified in switching from etanercept to SB4.

Article Abstract

Objectives: SB4 (Benepali, Brenzys) is a biosimilar of reference etanercept (ETN). In a randomised, double-blind, 52-week study, SB4 demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to ETN in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The open-label extension period evaluated long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity when continuing SB4 versus switching from ETN to SB4.

Methods: In the randomised, double-blind phase, patients received weekly subcutaneous administration of 50 mg SB4 or ETN with background methotrexate for up to 52 weeks. Patients in the Czech Republic and Poland who completed the 52-week visit were enrolled in the open-label extension period and received SB4 for 48 additional weeks. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 100.

Results: Of 245 patients entering the extension period, 126 continued to receive SB4 (SB4/SB4) and 119 switched to SB4 (ETN/SB4). American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response rates were sustained and comparable between SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 with ACR20 response rates at week 100 of 77.9% and 79.1%, respectively. Other efficacy results, including radiographic progression, were also comparable between the groups. After week 52, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were 47.6% (SB4/SB4) and 48.7% (ETN/SB4); one patient/group developed non-neutralising antidrug antibodies. No cases of active tuberculosis or injection-site reactions were reported during the extension period. One patient (SB4/SB4) died of hepatic cancer.

Conclusions: SB4 was effective and well tolerated over 2 years in patients with RA. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were comparable between the SB4/SB4 and ETN/SB4 groups, showing no risk associated with switching patients from ETN to SB4.

Trial Registration Number: NCT01895309; 2012-005026-30.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5705842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211591DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

efficacy safety
20
extension period
16
safety immunogenicity
12
sb4
10
long-term efficacy
8
patients rheumatoid
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
continuing sb4
8
reference etanercept
8
randomised double-blind
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: The use of taxanes in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer (BC) confers survival benefits, however, their role in older patients merits further study. This retrospective pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials conducted by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG) aims to assess the efficacy and safety of taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with BC.

Materials And Methods: Five phase III trials containing a taxane, conducted by HORG between 1995 and 2013, were included in a patient-data pooled analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!