In patients with intestinal failure who are receiving home parenteral support (HPS), catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) inflict health impairment and high costs. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of the antimicrobial catheter lock solution, taurolidine-citrate-heparin, compared with heparin 100 IE/mL on CRBSI occurrence. Forty-one high-risk patients receiving HPS followed in a tertiary HPS unit were randomly assigned in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. External, stratified randomization was performed according to age, sex, and prior CRBSI incidence. The prior CRBSI incidence in the study population was 2.4 episodes/1000 central venous catheter (CVC) days [95% Poisson confidence limits (CLs): 2.12, 2.71 episodes/1000 CVC days]. The maximum treatment period was 2 y or until occurrence of a CRBSI or right-censoring because of CVC removal. The exact permutation tests were used to calculate values for the log-rank tests. Twenty patients received the taurolidine-citrate-heparin lock and 21 received the heparin lock, with 9622 and 6956 treatment days, respectively. In the taurolidine-citrate-heparin arm, no CRBSIs occurred, whereas 7 CRBSIs occurred in the heparin arm, with an incidence of 1.0/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.4, 2.07/1000 CVC days; 0.005). The CVC removal rates were 0.52/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.17, 1.21/1000 CVC days) and 1.72/1000 CVC days (95% Poisson CLs: 0.89, 3.0/1000 CVC days) in the taurolidine-citrate-heparin and heparin arm, respectively, tending to prolong CVC survival in the taurolidine arm ( = 0.06). Costs per treatment year were lower in the taurolidine arm (€2348) than in the heparin arm (€6744) owing to fewer admission days related to treating CVC-related complications ( = 0.02). In patients with intestinal failure who are life dependent on HPS, the taurolidine-citrate-heparin catheter lock demonstrates a clinically substantial and cost-beneficial reduction of CRBSI occurrence in a high-risk population compared with heparin. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01948245.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.158964 | DOI Listing |
Semin Thromb Hemost
December 2024
Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida.
Infect Prev Pract
December 2024
Infection Control and Infectious Diseases Units, Hillel Yaffe Medical Centre, Hadera, Israel.
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential in modern healthcare but are associated with significant risks, particularly catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs). Current guidelines do not recommend routine replacement of CVCs based on time alone. However, recent evidence challenges this recommendation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Case Rep
December 2024
Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
A central venous catheter (CVC) was placed in the left internal jugular vein of a woman in her late 20s, who was admitted to our intensive care unit during the management of her abdominal wall sepsis. Two days later, the patient had pain at the insertion site. Check aspiration revealed the presence of aspirate from all the lumens except the distal lumen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurocrit Care
November 2024
Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
Background: Classic teaching in neurocritical care is to avoid jugular access for central venous catheterization (CVC) because of a presumed risk of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Limited data exist to test this hypothesis. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) leads to diffuse cerebral edema and often requires external ventricular drains (EVDs), which provide direct ICP measurements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNeurology
December 2024
From the Department of Medicine and Neurology (N.Y., V.Y., L.C., B.C.V.C., H.Z., G.A.D., S.M.D.), Melbourne Brain Centre @ The Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne; Population Health and Immunity Division (N.Y.), The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Division of Neurology (V.Y.), Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Melbourne Medical School (L.C.), University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Neurology (A.M., D.S.), Helsinki University Hospital, Finland; Department of Neurology (T.W.), Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand; Stroke Centre and Department of Neurology (J.-S.J.), National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei; Stroke Trials Unit (L.J.W., Z.K.L., P.M.B., N.S.), Mental Health & Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (C.O.), Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Medicine (Z.K.L.), Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur; Department of Neurology (H.-Q.G., X.N., J.L., L.L.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University; China National Clinical Research Centre for Neurological Diseases (H.-Q.G., X.N., J.L., L.L.), Beijing; and Department of Neurology (H.H.M.), Monash Medical Centre, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!