Torque, Current, and Discomfort During 3 Types of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of Tibialis Anterior.

Phys Ther

Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 4-218 Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H9.

Published: August 2017

Background: The benefits of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for rehabilitation depend on the capacity to generate functionally relevant torque with minimal fatigability and discomfort. Traditionally, NMES is delivered either over a muscle belly (mNMES) or a nerve trunk (nNMES). Recently, a technique that minimizes contraction fatigability by alternating pulses between the mNMES and nNMES sites, termed "interleaved" NMES (iNMES), was developed. However, discomfort and the ability to generate large torque during iNMES have not been explored adequately.

Objective: The study objective was to compare discomfort and maximal torque between mNMES, nNMES, and iNMES.

Methods: Stimulation trains (12 pulses at 40 Hz) were delivered to produce dorsiflexion torque using mNMES, nNMES, and iNMES. Discomfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale for contractions that generated 5-30% of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), and for the maximal tolerable torque.

Results: Discomfort scores were not different between NMES types when torque was ≤20% MVIC. At 30% MVIC, mNMES produced more discomfort than nNMES and iNMES. nNMES produced the most torque (65% MVIC), followed by iNMES (49% MVIC) and mNMES (33% MVIC); in these trials, mNMES produced more discomfort than nNMES, but not iNMES.

Limitations: The present results may be limited to individuals with no history of neuromusculoskeletal impairment.

Conclusions: In terms of discomfort, there were no differences between mNMES, nNMES, or iNMES for contractions between 5-20% MVIC. However, mNMES produced more discomfort than nNMES and iNMES for contractions of 30% MVIC, while for larger contractions, mNMES only produced more discomfort than nNMES. The advantages and disadvantages of each NMES type should be considered prior to implementation in rehabilitation programs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzx053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mnmes nnmes
16
nnmes inmes
16
mnmes produced
16
produced discomfort
16
discomfort nnmes
16
mvic mnmes
12
discomfort
11
mnmes
10
nnmes
10
neuromuscular electrical
8

Similar Publications

Torque, Current, and Discomfort During 3 Types of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of Tibialis Anterior.

Phys Ther

August 2017

Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, 4-218 Van Vliet Complex, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H9.

Background: The benefits of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for rehabilitation depend on the capacity to generate functionally relevant torque with minimal fatigability and discomfort. Traditionally, NMES is delivered either over a muscle belly (mNMES) or a nerve trunk (nNMES). Recently, a technique that minimizes contraction fatigability by alternating pulses between the mNMES and nNMES sites, termed "interleaved" NMES (iNMES), was developed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interleaved neuromuscular electrical stimulation after spinal cord injury.

Muscle Nerve

November 2017

Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, E-488 Van Vliet Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H9.

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) over a muscle belly (mNMES) recruits superficial motor units (MUs) preferentially, whereas NMES over a nerve trunk (nNMES) recruits MUs evenly throughout the muscle. We performed tests to determine whether "interleaving" pulses between the mNMES and nNMES sites (iNMES) reduces the fatigability of contractions for people experiencing paralysis because of chronic spinal cord injury.

Methods: Plantar flexion torque and soleus electromyography (M-waves) were recorded from 8 participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interleaved neuromuscular electrical stimulation: Motor unit recruitment overlap.

Muscle Nerve

April 2017

Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, 4-218 Van Vliet Complex, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, T6G 2H9.

Introduction: In this study, we quantified the "overlap" between motor units recruited by single pulses of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) delivered over the tibialis anterior muscle (mNMES) and the common peroneal nerve (nNMES). We then quantified the torque produced when pulses were alternated between the mNMES and nNMES sites at 40 Hz ("interleaved" NMES; iNMES).

Methods: Overlap was assessed by comparing torque produced by twitches evoked by mNMES, nNMES, and both delivered together, over a range of stimulus intensities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interleaved neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces muscle fatigue.

Muscle Nerve

February 2017

Human Neurophysiology Laboratory, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, E-488 Van Vliet Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H9, Canada.

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be delivered over a muscle belly (mNMES) or nerve trunk (nNMES). Both methods generate contractions that fatigue rapidly due, in part, to non-physiologically high motor unit (MU) discharge frequencies. In this study we introduce interleaved NMES (iNMES), whereby stimulus pulses are alternated between mNMES and nNMES.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

H-reflexes reduce fatigue of evoked contractions after spinal cord injury.

Muscle Nerve

August 2014

Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, E-488 Van Vliet Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2H9; Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) over a muscle belly (mNMES) generates contractions predominantly through M-waves, while NMES over a nerve trunk (nNMES) can generate contractions through H-reflexes in people who are neurologically intact. We tested whether the differences between mNMES and nNMES are present in people with chronic motor-complete spinal cord injury and, if so, whether they influence contraction fatigue.

Methods: Plantar-flexion torque and soleus electromyography were recorded from 8 participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!