A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Metabolic tumor volume of primary tumor predicts survival better than T classification in the larynx preservation approach. | LitMetric

We aimed to determine whether pretreatment metabolic tumor volume of the primary tumor (T-MTV) or T classification would be a better predictor of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) after chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer requiring total laryngectomy. We analyzed 85 patients using a Cox proportional hazards model and evaluated its usefulness by Akaike's information criterion. A T-MTV cut-off value was determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Interobserver reliability for measuring T-MTV was estimated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). After adjustment for covariables, T-MTV, irrespective of whether a continuous or dichotomized variable, and T classification remained independent predictors of LFS and OS. Large T-MTV (>28.7 mL) was associated with inferior LFS (hazard ratio [HR], 4.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-8.70; P = 0.0003) and inferior OS (HR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.47-6.69; P = 0.004) compared with small T-MTV (≤28.7 mL). The T-MTV model outperformed the T classification model in predicting LFS and OS (P = 0.007 and 0.01, respectively). Three-year LFS and OS rates for patients with small versus large T-MTV were 68% vs 9% (P < 0.0001) and 77% vs 25% (P < 0.0001), respectively, whereas those for patients with T2-T3 versus T4a were 61% vs 31% (P = 0.003) and 71% vs 48% (P = 0.10), respectively. ICC was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00). Given the excellent interobserver reliability, T-MTV is better than T classification to identify patients who would benefit from the larynx preservation approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623730PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13345DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

t-mtv
9
metabolic tumor
8
tumor volume
8
volume primary
8
primary tumor
8
better classification
8
larynx preservation
8
preservation approach
8
interobserver reliability
8
large t-mtv
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!