Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim of this study was to study the vulvar thermal pattern variation during the timed artificial insemination protocol in Angora goat and identify the relationship with the successful rate. Does (36 adult healthy females) were synchronized using PGF2α at the day 0, 11 days of progesterone impregnated sponges intra-vaginally, PMSG 48 h before sponges withdraw (day 11) and the intra-cervical inseminations were carried out 48 h later (Timed Artificial Insemination: TAI) with chilled semen. Vulvar (VST) and perivulvar (PST) areas were considered to evaluate the thermal pattern during the protocol at the day 0 and at the TAI using a thermo camera (E60, FLIR System). Differences of temperature (ΔT) between the surfaces were calculated for each time. The does were monitored for pregnancy, delivery time and prolificacy. Pregnant (P) and non-pregnant (NP) does were compared in terms of VST, PST and ΔT using two ways ANOVA considering time and pregnancy as sources of variability. VST was lower than PST in all the monitored does (P < 0.05) (34.79 ± 0.14 vs 36.58 ± 0.14 °C) and without differences between P and NP at day 0 (35 ± 0.18 vs 36.39 ± 0.22 °C). Significant difference (P < 0.05) between P and NP does was recorded at TAI in terms of VST (33.89 ± 0.31 vs 35.40 ± 0.24 °C) and ΔT (-3.16 ± 0.34 vs -1.62 ± 0.26 °C). In conclusion thermal emission by glabrous surfaces in goat may be used to identify the right response induced by hormonal treatments and to optimize the application of assisted reproductive techniques at the field level.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.07.038 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!