Background: Early chemotherapy has recently become a new standard of care for patients with metastatic castrate-naive prostate cancer (mCNPC). The survival benefit is evident in patients with high-volume disease, but less clear in those with low-volume disease. Here, we assessed the trade-offs between toxicity and survival using a Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms of disease and Toxicity of treatment (Q-TWiST) analysis.

Patients And Methods: This analysis was performed from the data of the Genito-Urinary Oncology Group (GETUG)-AFU 15 phase III trial evaluating the benefits of docetaxel (D) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone in 385 mCNPC patients. Overall survival was partitioned into three periods, namely toxic phase of treatment (TOX), time before progression without toxicity (TWIST), and progression (PROG). These health states were weighted according to patients' utility to determine quality-adjusted survival times. In threshold analyses, utility for TOX and PROG were varied from 0 to 1.

Results: A better quality-adjusted survival was found in the ADT + D arm when the utility for PROG and TOX states were ≤0.2 and ≥ 0.8, respectively. When the utility for PROG was 0.4 or more, ADT + D and ADT alone yielded similar quality-adjusted survival. When patients were stratified into high-volume versus low-volume disease, we found a significant Q-TWiST benefit in favour of the ADT + D arm only for high-volume patients when the utility for PROG was less than 0.35, while we found no benefit in low-volume disease patients, whatever the coefficients tested.

Conclusion: Early docetaxel may provide significant quality-adjusted survival benefits for patients with mCNPC, especially those with high-volume disease, depending on the values assigned to the times spent in the toxicity phase and after PROG. The Q-TWiST methodology is a useful tool for decision-making regarding trade-offs between survival, PROG and toxicity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality-adjusted survival
16
low-volume disease
12
utility prog
12
patients
8
patients metastatic
8
prostate cancer
8
androgen deprivation
8
deprivation therapy
8
phase iii
8
survival
8

Similar Publications

Background: Lung cancer screening recommendations employ annual frequency for eligible individuals, despite evidence that it may not be universally optimal. The impact of imposing a structure on the screening frequency remains unknown. The ENGAGE framework, a validated framework that offers fully dynamic, analytically optimal, personalised lung cancer screening recommendations, could be used to assess the impact of screening structure on the effectiveness and efficiency of lung cancer screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Lazertinib demonstrates efficacy similar to that of osimertinib in the first-line treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor ()-mutated advanced lung cancer. However, its cost-effectiveness has not yet been evaluated.

Objective: To study the cost-effectiveness of lazertinib as a first-line treatment for patients with -mutated advanced lung cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The phase III NAPOLI-3 trial, which upgraded FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) to NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil), demonstrated the superiority of NALIRIFOX over GEMNABP (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) as the first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and GEMNABP, and to simulate the price of liposomal irinotecan at which NALIRIFOX could achieve cost-effectiveness.

Methods: A partitioned survival model was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX and GEMNABP from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Therap Adv Gastroenterol

January 2025

State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macao.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Recent advancements in targeted therapies have improved outcomes for advanced HCC, yet therapeutic options remain limited. The CARES-310 trial demonstrated that camrelizumab plus rivoceranib significantly improves survival compared to sorafenib for advanced HCC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) contributes to the heavy burden, but there lacks latest and comprehensive global research on the burden of T2DM attributable to low physical activity (LPA). This study aimed to quantify the global and regional burden of T2DM attributable to LPA from 1990 to 2021.

Methods: We utilized data including disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), mortality, age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (ASDR), and age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!