Both a DNA lesion and an intermediate for antibody maturation, uracil is primarily processed by base excision repair (BER), either initiated by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) or by single-strand selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (SMUG1). The relative in vivo contributions of each glycosylase remain elusive. To assess the impact of SMUG1 deficiency, we measured uracil and 5-hydroxymethyluracil, another SMUG1 substrate, in Smug1 mice. We found that 5-hydroxymethyluracil accumulated in Smug1 tissues and correlated with 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels. The highest increase was found in brain, which contained about 26-fold higher genomic 5-hydroxymethyluracil levels than the wild type. Smug1 mice did not accumulate uracil in their genome and Ung mice showed slightly elevated uracil levels. Contrastingly, Ung Smug1 mice showed a synergistic increase in uracil levels with up to 25-fold higher uracil levels than wild type. Whole genome sequencing of UNG/SMUG1-deficient tumours revealed that combined UNG and SMUG1 deficiency leads to the accumulation of mutations, primarily C to T transitions within CpG sequences. This unexpected sequence bias suggests that CpG dinucleotides are intrinsically more mutation prone. In conclusion, we showed that SMUG1 efficiently prevent genomic uracil accumulation, even in the presence of UNG, and identified mutational signatures associated with combined UNG and SMUG1 deficiency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5543110 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07314-5 | DOI Listing |
Int J Mol Sci
June 2023
Groupe de Recherche en Écologie Buccale, Faculté de Médecine Dentaire, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Breast Cancer (BC) is one of the most common and challenging cancers among females worldwide. Conventional treatments for oral cancer rely on the use of radiology and surgery accompanied by chemotherapy. Chemotherapy presents many side effects, and the cells often develop resistance to this chemotherapy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Mol Sci
May 2023
Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), 8 Prospekt Akad. Lavrentyeva, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Base excision repair (BER) is one of the important systems for the maintenance of genome stability via repair of DNA lesions. BER is a multistep process involving a number of enzymes, including damage-specific DNA glycosylases, apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1, DNA polymerase β, and DNA ligase. Coordination of BER is implemented by multiple protein-protein interactions between BER participants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Transl Res
April 2023
Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) Shanghai 200438, China.
Objectives: To investigate the role of DNA methylation regulators in the prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and to construct a DNA methylation regulator-based signature for predicting patient outcome.
Methods: Data from the TCGA dataset were downloaded and analyzed to identify differentially expressed DNA methylation regulators and their interaction as well as correlation. Consensus clustering was used to establish groups of ccRCC with distinct clinical outcomes.
Front Aging
May 2022
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Inflammation is implicated in the etiology of various aging-related diseases. Numerous dietary and lifestyle factors contribute to chronic systemic inflammation; genetic variation may too. However, despite biological plausibility, little is known about associations of antioxidant enzyme (AE) and DNA base excision repair (BER) genotypes with human systemic inflammation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNucleic Acids Res
April 2021
Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Uracil occurs at replication forks via misincorporation of deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) or via deamination of existing cytosines, which occurs 2-3 orders of magnitude faster in ssDNA than in dsDNA and is 100% miscoding. Tethering of UNG2 to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) allows rapid post-replicative removal of misincorporated uracil, but potential 'pre-replicative' removal of deaminated cytosines in ssDNA has been questioned since this could mediate mutagenic translesion synthesis and induction of double-strand breaks. Here, we demonstrate that uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG), but not SMUG1 efficiently excises uracil from replication protein A (RPA)-coated ssDNA and that this depends on functional interaction between the flexible winged-helix (WH) domain of RPA2 and the N-terminal RPA-binding helix in UNG.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!