AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on improving tuberculosis (TB) screening methods for high-risk groups, utilizing a multiplex microbead immunoassay to measure antibody responses to specific M. tuberculosis antigens.* -
  • Researchers analyzed plasma samples from HIV-negative adults with prolonged cough, finding significant differences in antibody levels between those with and without confirmed TB.* -
  • A specific panel of eight antigens showed high sensitivity (90.6%) and good specificity (88.6%) for detecting TB, indicating that antibody response measurements could enhance screening efforts in targeted populations.*

Article Abstract

Background: Improved systematic screening of high-risk groups is a key component of the tuberculosis (TB) elimination strategy endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO). We used a multiplex microbead immunoassay to measure antibody responses to 28 M. tuberculosis (M.tb) antigens, and assessed whether combinations of antibody responses achieve accuracy thresholds required for a TB screening test.

Methods: A random selection of plasma samples obtained from consecutive HIV-negative adults who were admitted to Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda with cough ≥2 weeks' but <6 months' duration were analyzed for serological response to 28 M.tb antigens using an in-house multiplex microbead immunoassay. We compared the median difference of the antibody response to each antigen between patients with and without culture-confirmed TB, ranked each antigen according to variable importance (VIM), and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of combinations of antibody responses using an advanced classification algorithm, SuperLearner.

Results: Among the 237 patients included in the analysis, 119 (50%) were female, median age was 32 years (IQR 25, 46), and 113 (48%) had TB. Median antibody levels to eight antigens were significantly different between patients with and without TB. A panel including eight of the top ranked antigens had a sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI 89.4, 93.8) and a specificity of 88.6% (95% CI 78.2, 97.6) (Ag85B, Ag85A, Ag85C, Rv0934-P38, Rv3881, BfrB, Rv3873, and Rv2878c). With sensitivity constrained to be >90%, specificity remained close to 70% with as few as 3 antigens included in the panels.

Conclusions: Measuring antibody responses to combinations of antigens could facilitate TB screening and should be further evaluated in populations being targeted for systematic screening.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540581PMC
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180122PLOS

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antibody responses
12
evaluation antibody
4
responses panels
4
tuberculosis
4
panels tuberculosis
4
tuberculosis antigens
4
antigens screening
4
screening tool
4
tool active
4
active tuberculosis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!