Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: Xenograft bone plate-screws (XBPSs) can be alternative tools in lumbar transpedicular stabilization (TS). The aim of this study was to show biomechanical and histopathological contribution of the XBPSs system in lumbar TS.
Materials And Methods: Fifteen ( = 15) hybrid dog and ten ( = 10) L cadaveric specimens were included in the study. The dogs were separated according to surgical techniques: L laminectomy and bilateral facetectomy (LBF) in Group I (experimental group [EG I] ( = 5), L LBF plus TS with metal plate-screws (MPSs) in Group II (EG II) ( = 5), and L LBF plus TS with XBPSs in Group III (EG III) ( = 5). The cadaveric specimens were separated to L intact in Group I (CG I), ( = 5), and L LBF in Group II (CG II), ( = 5). The dogs were sacrificed at the end of 3 month, and their L spinal segments were removed and prepared as in control groups. Flexion, extension, left-right bending, rotation, and compression tests were applied to all segments. Stiffness values were calculated and analyzed statistically. All dog segments were evaluated histopathologically.
Results: XBPS system showed a higher average stiffness values for left bending, extension, flexion, and compression compared to MPS, but these differences were not statistically meaningful. XBPS system had superiority to the fusion formation, as well.
Conclusions: XBPSs provide stability and help the fusion formation, but this system does not have a biomechanical advantage over MPS system in TS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5532937 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1793-5482.185061 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!