A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnosis of acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding with CT-angiography: Comparison of the diagnostic performance of individual acquisition phases. | LitMetric

Diagnosis of acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding with CT-angiography: Comparison of the diagnostic performance of individual acquisition phases.

Diagn Interv Imaging

Department of Body and Interventional Imaging, hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, 2, rue Ambroise Paré, 75475 Paris cedex 10, France; Université Paris 5, Sorbonne Paris Cité, rue de l'école de médecine, 75006 Paris, France; UMR Inserm 965, hôpital Lariboisière, 2, rue Amboise-Paré, 75010 Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: December 2017

Purpose: To compare the respective values of arterial phase, portal venous phase and combination of phases using 64-section multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for diagnosing acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (AOGIB).

Patients And Methods: Forty-nine patients with AOGIB were included. There were 30 men and 19 women, with a mean age of 65.4±15.6 (SD) years [range, 34-91years]. Two observers reviewed MDCT examinations in consensus for presence of active bleeding, location of bleeding site and nature of causative lesion. The different acquisition phases were reviewed independently.

Results: AOGIB was identified in 28/49 patients (57%) with the multiphasic set, in 26/49 patients (53%) with arterial phase and in 25/49 patients (51%) with portal venous phase. Multiphasic set helped locate the bleeding site in 40/49 patients (82%). The cause was elucidated in 23/49 patients (47%) with multiphasic set. The differences between set performances were not statistically significant. Sensitivity for depicting AOGIB with the multiphasic set was 92% and specificity was 76%.

Conclusion: Multiphasic 64-section MDCT has high diagnostic performances in patients with AOGIB. Further studies with a larger population are needed to reach statistical significance and demonstrate better diagnostic performance of multiphasic MDCT in comparison with the arterial or portal phase alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.06.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multiphasic set
16
acute overt
8
overt gastrointestinal
8
gastrointestinal bleeding
8
diagnostic performance
8
acquisition phases
8
arterial phase
8
portal venous
8
venous phase
8
patients aogib
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!