Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To implement an inpatient glucose management (IGM) programme in the general medical wards and evaluate its clinical efficacy.
Method: Consecutive patients admitted to selected medical wards over a 12-month period were included in the IGM programme. All patients with ≥3 capillary blood glucose (CBG) readings (>10.0 mmol/L and/or <4.0 mmol/L) over a 24-hour period were identified electronically. A multidisciplinary team of diabetes care providers would provide specialist input to these patients. The control group comprised of consecutive patients admitted over the preceding 12 months. Outcome glucose measures include mean in-hospital glucose (MHG), mean patient-day glucose (MDG), proportion of CBG readings at predefined cut-offs and length of stay (LOS).
Results: Both the MHG and MDG were significantly lower following intervention (10.0±2.4 mmol/L vs 11.2±2.6 mmol/L, P<.001; 10.0±2.3 mmol/L vs 11.2±2.6 mmol/L, P<.001, respectively). Prevalence of hyperglycaemic events, defined by CBG >10.0 mmol/L, was significantly lower at 36.5% versus 51.6% (P<.001). Hypoglycaemic events of CBG <4.0 mmol/L remained infrequent at <1.0% before and after IGM programme. A greater proportion of glucose readings was controlled within the target range of 4.0-10.0 mmol/L (62.6% vs 47.6%, P<.001). With the IGM programme in place, more patients received scheduled CBG monitoring, and a significant shortening of mean LOS by 3.2 days was observed (P=.02).
Conclusions: The IGM programme was effective in improving inpatient glycaemic monitoring and control in the general medical wards, with a significant reduction in LOS observed. These demonstrated the programme's potential to enhance quality and efficiency of patient care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12985 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!