Purpose: The emergence of tense-morpheme marking during language acquisition is highly variable, which confounds the use of tense marking as a diagnostic indicator of language impairment in linguistically diverse populations. In this study, we seek to better understand tense-marking patterns in young bilingual children by comparing phonological influences on marking of 2 word-final tense morphemes.
Method: In spontaneous connected speech samples from 10 Spanish-English dual language learners aged 56-66 months (M = 61.7, SD = 3.4), we examined marking rates of past tense -ed and third person singular -s morphemes in different environments, using multiple measures of phonological context.
Results: Both morphemes were found to exhibit notably contrastive marking patterns in some contexts. Each was most sensitive to a different combination of phonological influences in the verb stem and the following word.
Conclusions: These findings extend existing evidence from monolingual speakers for the influence of word-final phonological context on morpheme production to a bilingual population. Further, novel findings not yet attested in previous research support an expanded consideration of phonological context in clinical decision making and future research related to word-final morphology.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5829801 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0402 | DOI Listing |
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Fleni, Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Background: Surface dyslexia serves as a complementary feature in the classification of the semantic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA), while reading deficits have also been reported in the other two PPA variants. In opaque languages, tasks involving regular and irregular words and non-words are useful tools for dyslexia diagnosis. However, in transparent languages like Spanish, where most words are regular for reading, different approaches are needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
December 2024
Department of Linguistics, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.
J Exp Psychol Gen
December 2024
Department of Psychology, Harvard University.
It is well-established that people make predictions during language comprehension--the nature and specificity of these predictions, however, remain unclear. For example, do comprehenders routinely make predictions about which words (and phonological forms) might come next in a conversation, or do they simply make broad predictions about the gist of the unfolding context? Prior EEG studies using tightly controlled experimental designs have shown that form-based prediction can occur during comprehension, as N400s to unexpected words are reduced when they resemble the form of a predicted word (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
November 2024
Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program in Literacy Studies, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys
November 2024
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave. PCD 4118G, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Readers are able to begin processing upcoming words before directly fixating them, and in some cases skip words altogether (i.e., never fixated).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!