Aim: Determine whether using CYP2C19 genotype to optimize antiplatelet therapy selection is cost effective over the initial 30 days and 1-year following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Materials & Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis compared 30-day and 1-year outcomes and cost across three treatment strategies (universal clopidogrel, universal prasugrel, genotype-guided) in a hypothetical cohort.

Results: Base-case scenario results at 30 days indicated that the incremental cost per major cardiovascular or bleeding event avoided for genotype-guided treatment was US$8525 and US$42,198 compared with universal clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that genotype-guided treatment was cost effective over 30 days and 1 year in 62 and 70% of simulations, respectively.

Conclusion: Implementing a CYP2C19 genotype-guided approach to antiplatelet therapy could have a positive economic impact by preventing readmissions following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2017-0075DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antiplatelet therapy
12
percutaneous coronary
12
cost-effectiveness analysis
8
30-day 1-year
8
1-year outcomes
8
coronary intervention
8
cost effective
8
universal clopidogrel
8
genotype-guided treatment
8
cyp2c19-guided antiplatelet
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!