AI Article Synopsis

  • The arrival of 454 sequencing was a big deal because it allowed scientists to study more complex environmental samples than before with Sanger sequencing.
  • Illumina MiSeq sequencing provides even deeper insights but produces shorter sequences compared to 454.
  • In comparing both methods, researchers found that Illumina MiSeq showed higher amounts of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in plant roots, but overall richness was similar when proper checks were made.

Article Abstract

The arrival of 454 sequencing represented a major breakthrough by allowing deeper sequencing of environmental samples than was possible with existing Sanger approaches. Illumina MiSeq provides a further increase in sequencing depth but shorter read length compared with 454 sequencing. We explored whether Illumina sequencing improves estimates of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal richness in plant root samples, compared with 454 sequencing. We identified AM fungi in root samples by sequencing amplicons of the SSU rRNA gene with 454 and Illumina MiSeq paired-end sequencing. In addition, we sequenced metagenomic DNA without prior PCR amplification. Amplicon-based Illumina sequencing yielded two orders of magnitude higher sequencing depth per sample than 454 sequencing. Initial analysis with minimal quality control recorded five times higher AM fungal richness per sample with Illumina sequencing. Additional quality control of Illumina samples, including restriction of the marker region to the most variable amplicon fragment, revealed AM fungal richness values close to those produced by 454 sequencing. Furthermore, AM fungal richness estimates were not correlated with sequencing depth between 300 and 30,000 reads per sample, suggesting that the lower end of this range is sufficient for adequate description of AM fungal communities. By contrast, metagenomic Illumina sequencing yielded very few AM fungal reads and taxa and was dominated by plant DNA, suggesting that AM fungal DNA is present at prohibitively low abundance in colonised root samples. In conclusion, Illumina MiSeq sequencing yielded higher sequencing depth, but similar richness of AM fungi in root samples, compared with 454 sequencing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0791-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

454 sequencing
24
sequencing depth
20
sequencing
18
illumina sequencing
16
fungal richness
16
root samples
16
illumina miseq
12
compared 454
12
sequencing yielded
12
arbuscular mycorrhizal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!