AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explores the use of the BI-RADS Mammography Atlas 5th Edition for assessing breast lesions in dedicated breast computed tomography (DBCT) since no dedicated atlas currently exists.
  • Four radiologists analyzed 30 DBCT cases with marked lesions, finding a mix of malignant and benign cases while assessing different characteristics like breast density and final assessment based on the BI-RADS criteria.
  • Results indicated high sensitivity (96.9%) but lower specificity (52.9%) in identifying lesions; overall agreement among radiologists was substantial for primary findings but moderate for breast density and final assessments.

Article Abstract

Rationale And Objectives: Dedicated breast computed tomography (DBCT) is an emerging and promising modality for breast lesions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential use of applying the BI-RADS Mammography Atlas 5th Edition for reporting and assessing breast lesions on DBCT. Currently, no atlas exists for DBCT.

Materials And Methods: Four radiologists trained in breast imaging were recruited in this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. The enrolled radiologists, who were blinded to mammographic and histopathologic findings, individually reviewed 30 randomized DBCT cases that contained marked lesions. Thirty-four lesions were included in this study: 24 (70.6%) masses, 7 (20.6%) calcifications, and 3 (8.8%) architectural distortions. Eight (23.5%) lesions were malignant and 26 (76.5%) were benign. The reader was asked to specify according to the BI-RADS Mammography Atlas for each marked DBCT lesion: primary findings, features, breast density, and final assessment. We calculated readers' diagnostic performances for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions and interobserver variability for reporting and assessing lesions using a generalized estimating equation and the Fleiss kappa (κ) statistic.

Results: The estimated overall sensitivity of the readers was 0.969, and the specificity was 0.529. There were no significant differences in the sensitivity and the specificity between lesion types. For reporting the presence of a primary finding, the overall substantial agreement (κ = 0.70) was seen. In assigning the breast density and the final assessment, the overall agreement was moderate (κ = 0.53) and fair (κ = 0.30).

Conclusion: The use of the BI-RADS Mammography Atlas 5th Edition for DBCT showed high performance and good agreement among readers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.06.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bi-rads mammography
16
mammography atlas
16
reporting assessing
12
lesions
8
assessing lesions
8
dedicated breast
8
breast imaging
8
breast lesions
8
atlas 5th
8
5th edition
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!