A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Implementing technical refinement in high-level athletics: exploring the knowledge schemas of coaches. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates how experienced coaches refine the techniques of athletes in events like long jump, triple jump, and javelin throwing through interviews with six successful coaches.
  • - Coaches typically use methods aligned with established literature, emphasizing athlete "buy-in," part-practice, and performing under pressure, although their individualized approaches to the refinement process differ.
  • - The findings highlight that coaches rely primarily on personal experience rather than formal training or knowledge sources, indicating a need for better communication between researchers and coach educators to improve technique refinement practices.

Article Abstract

This paper explores the approaches adopted by high-level field athletics coaches when attempting to refine an athlete's already well-established technique (long and triple jump and javelin throwing). Six coaches, who had all coached multiple athletes to multiple major championships, took part in semi-structured interviews focused upon a recent example of technique refinement. Data were analysed using a thematic content analysis. The coaching tools reported were generally consistent with those advised by the existing literature, focusing on attaining "buy-in", utilising part-practice, restoring movement automaticity and securing performance under pressure. Five of the six coaches reported using a systematic sequence of stages to implement the refinement, although the number and content of these stages varied between them. Notably, however, there were no formal sources of knowledge (e.g., coach education or training) provided to inform coaches' decision making. Instead, coaches' decisions were largely based on experience both within and outside the sporting domain. Data offer a useful stimulus for reflection amongst sport practitioners confronted by the problem of technique refinement. Certainly the limited awareness of existing guidelines on technique refinement expressed by the coaches emphasises a need for further collaborative work by researchers and coach educators to disseminate best practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1358339DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

technique refinement
12
refinement
5
coaches
5
implementing technical
4
technical refinement
4
refinement high-level
4
high-level athletics
4
athletics exploring
4
exploring knowledge
4
knowledge schemas
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!