Objectives: Recent research has shown that concentric contact lenses (CLs) can be a way to control the progression of myopia. The purpose of the current study was to compare vision-related quality-of-life measures in children wearing distance single-vision (SV) spectacles versus MiSight CLs, a specific concentric design for myopia control.
Methods: Subjects aged 8 to 12 with myopia from -0.75 to -4.00 diopters (D) of sphere and astigmatism less than 1.00 D of cylinder were allocated to the lenses study group (MiSight) or control group (SV). A Pediatric Refractive Error Profile (PREP) questionnaire was administered at 12- and 24-month intervals to evaluate children's perceptions in overall vision, near vision, far distance vision, symptoms, appearance, satisfaction, activities, academic performance, handling, and peer perceptions. The mean score of all items was calculated as the overall score.
Results: In total, 74 children completed the study: n=41 in the MiSight group and n=33 in the SV group. In the MiSight group, the ratings at 12 and 24 months for appearance, satisfaction, effect on activities, handling, and peer perceptions were significantly better than those given by children in the SV group (P<0.001), as was the overall score. However, near vision was significantly better in the SV group at both 12 and 24 months (P<0.001).
Conclusions: MiSight CL wear for controlling myopia improves vision-related quality of life in children when compared with spectacle wear.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000413 | DOI Listing |
J Neurol
December 2024
APHM, Hôpital de la Timone, CEMEREM, Marseille, France.
Objective: In this multicentric study, we were interested in the vision-related quality of life and its association with visual impairment in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) in comparison to multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy controls.
Methods: We analysed extracted data from the German NEMOS registry including National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) scores, high and low contrast visual acuity (HCVA, LCVA), visually evoked potentials (VEP) and the scores for the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and other neurological tests which assessed their disease-related impairment. The mean follow-up time of our patients was 1.
Ophthalmol Retina
December 2024
Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Cleveland Clinic Martin Hospitals, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Stuart, FL. Electronic address:
Objective: To evaluate the impact of total duration of intraretinal fluid (IRF) exposure on visual acuity and vision-related quality of life in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Design: A post hoc analysis of integrated data from the VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 trials.
Participants: Patients with nAMD.
BMC Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Ziyang Central Hospital, Sichuan, 641300, China.
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of modified limbal stem cell transplantation(Modified LSC transplantation) and bandage contact lens(BCL) implantation in pterygium surgery.
Methods: A total of 479 patients with primary pterygium who were admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2023 were randomly divided into three groups: the normal group (Group A: 89 patients), the control group (Group B: 195 patients), and the modified group (Group C: 195 patients). Each group received different intervention measures.
Transl Vis Sci Technol
December 2024
Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia.
Clin Exp Optom
November 2024
Department of Statistics, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Clinical Relevance: Myopia control is a prominent area of global research, with multifocal contact lenses identified as an effective intervention for adolescents.
Background: This study aims to evaluate the visual performance and vision-related quality of life (QoL) of myopic adolescents when corrected with pupil-optimised multifocal soft contact lenses (MFSCLs) versus single-vision contact lenses (SVCLs), with each participant serving as their own control.
Methods: Thirty-five myopic adolescents, habitually wearing SVCLs and fitted with pupil-optimised MFSCL with mid-addition power, were recruited.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!