Behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia: Distinct phenotypes with unique functional profiles.

Neurology

From the Ageing, Work and Health Research Unit (C.M.O., L.C.), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney; Neuroscience Research Australia and University of New South Wales (R.L.-R., C.K., N.D., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.); Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders (R.L.-R., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.), University of New South Wales; Brain and Mind Centre (R.L.-R., J.R.H., S.H., O.P.), Sydney, Australia; and School of Health Sciences (E.M.), University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Published: August 2017

Objective: To identify distinct behavioral phenotypes of behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) and to elucidate differences in functional, neuroimaging, and progression to residential care placement.

Methods: Eighty-eight patients with bvFTD were included in a cluster analysis applying levels of disinhibition and apathy (Cambridge Behavioural Inventory-Revised) to identify phenotypic subgroups. Between-group (Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney ) functional differences (Disability Assessment for Dementia) and time to residential care placement (survival analyses) were examined. Cortical thickness differences (whole-brain MRI) were analyzed in patients with bvFTD vs healthy controls (n = 30) and between phenotypic subgroups.

Results: Four phenotypic subgroups were identified: primary severe apathy (n = 26), severe apathy and disinhibition (n = 26), mild apathy and disinhibition (n = 27), and primary severe disinhibition (n = 9). Patients with severely apathetic phenotypes were more functionally impaired and had more extensive brain atrophy than those with mild apathy or severe disinhibition alone. Further imaging analyses indicated that the right middle temporal region is critical for the development of disinhibition, an association that remains with disease progression and in the context of severe apathy. Finally, no difference in time to residential care admission was found between phenotypes.

Conclusions: This study reveals that different clinical behavioral phenotypes of bvFTD have differing profiles of functional decline and distinct patterns of associated cortical changes. These findings emphasize the importance of apathy in functional impairment, highlight the role of the right temporal region in disinhibition, and suggest that disability may be a sensitive outcome measure for treatments targeting reduction of apathy. These phenotypes could also support understanding of prognosis and clinical management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5562953PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004215DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

residential care
12
severe apathy
12
behavioral-variant frontotemporal
8
frontotemporal dementia
8
behavioral phenotypes
8
patients bvftd
8
apathy
8
phenotypic subgroups
8
time residential
8
primary severe
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!