Subtypes of borderline personality disorder patients: a cluster-analytic approach.

Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Published: July 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • * The largest group ("core BPD") showed typical BPD traits without other significant personality issues, while the other two groups exhibited additional traits like narcissism or paranoia.
  • * The findings suggest that despite distinct profiles, the differences among the subtypes are minor, indicating a shared underlying factor in BPD that warrants further research for better treatment approaches.

Article Abstract

Background: The borderline personality disorder (BPD) population is notably heterogeneous, and this has potentially important implications for intervention. Identifying distinct subtypes of patients may represent a first step in identifying which treatments work best for which individuals.

Methods: A cluster-analysis on dimensional personality disorder (PD) features, as assessed with the SCID-II, was performed on a sample of carefully screened BPD patients ( = 187) referred for mentalization-based treatment. The optimal cluster solution was determined using multiple indices of fit. The validity of the clusters was explored by investigating their relationship with borderline pathology, symptom severity, interpersonal problems, quality of life, personality functioning, attachment, and trauma history, in addition to demographic and clinical features.

Results: A three-cluster solution was retained, which identified three clusters of BPD patients with distinct profiles. The largest cluster ( = 145) consisted of patients characterized by "core BPD" features, without marked elevations on other PD dimensions. A second "Extravert/externalizing" cluster of patients ( = 27) was characterized by high levels of histrionic, narcissistic, and antisocial features. A third, smaller "Schizotypal/paranoid" cluster ( = 15) consisted of patients with marked schizotypal and paranoid features. Patients in these clusters showed theoretically meaningful differences in terms of demographic and clinical features.

Conclusions: Three meaningful subtypes of BPD patients were identified with distinct profiles. Differences were small, even when controlling for severity of PD pathology, suggesting a strong common factor underlying BPD. These results may represent a stepping stone toward research with larger samples aimed at replicating the findings and investigating differential trajectories of change, treatment outcomes, and treatment approaches for these subtypes.

Trial Registration: The study was retrospectively registered 16 April 2010 in the , no. NTR2292.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5494904PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40479-017-0066-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

personality disorder
12
bpd patients
12
patients
9
borderline personality
8
demographic clinical
8
distinct profiles
8
consisted patients
8
bpd
5
subtypes borderline
4
personality
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!