Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Exenatide and cyclosporine A have been shown to moderately protect against myocardial reperfusion injury leading to reduction of infarct size in patients. Our objective was to investigate whether the combined treatment with exenatide (glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist) and cyclosporine A or parstatin 1-26 (inhibitors of mitochondrial permeability transition pore and/or inflammation) is more beneficial than either agent alone. Rabbits underwent 40 minutes of ischemia and 120 minutes of reperfusion. Intravenous bolus administration of exenatide or cyclosporine A, 10 minutes before reperfusion, reduced infarct size by 38% (P < 0.05) and 40% (P < 0.05), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) plasma levels by 48% (P < 0.05) and 36% (P < 0.05), respectively, compared with control. The combined administration of both agents resulted in an additive decrease of infarct size by 55% (P < 0.05) and cTnI release by 61% (P < 0.05). Also, combined treatment of exenatide and parstatin 1-26 enhanced infarct size reduction (62%, P < 0.05), compared with monotherapies (41% for parstatin 1-26, P < 0.05; 43% for exenatide, P < 0.05). In contrast, the combined administration of parstatin 1-26 and cyclosporine A canceled out the cardioprotective effects observed by monotherapies. These results suggest that, for the therapy of myocardial reperfusion injury the combined administration of exenatide and cyclosporine A or parstatin 1-26 is more effective than monotherapies and may provide advantageous clinical outcome.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000000492 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!