Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this study we investigated balancing responses to lateral perturbations during slow walking (0.85m/s). A group of seven healthy individuals walked on an instrumented treadmill while being perturbed at the level of waist at left heel strike in outward and inward lateral directions. Centre of mass (COM) and centre of pressure (COP), rotation of pelvis around vertical axis, step lengths, step widths and step times were assessed. The results have shown that beside control of COP in lateral direction, facilitated by adequate step widths, control of COP in sagittal direction, slowing down movement of COM was present after commencement of lateral perturbations. Sagittal component of COM was significantly retarded as compared to unperturbed walking for both inward (4.32±1.29cm) and outward (9.75±2.17cm) perturbations. This was necessary since after an inward perturbation first step length (0.29±0.04m compared to 0.52±0.02m in unperturbed walking) and step time (0.45±0.05s compared to 0.61±0.04s in unperturbed walking) were shortened while after an outward perturbation first two step lengths (0.36±0.05m and 0.32±0.11m compared to 0.52±0.03m in unperturbed walking) were shortened that needed to be accommodated by the described modulation of COP in sagittal plane. In addition pronounced pelvis rotation assisted in bringing swing leg to new location. The results of this study show that counteracting lateral perturbations at slow walking requires adequate response in all three planes of motion.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.020 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!