A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization? | LitMetric

Complex US adnexal masses during pregnancy: Is pelvic MR imaging accurate for characterization?

Eur J Radiol

Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CALG Cancer Associé à La Grossesse, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Tenon, Service de Gynécologie et Obstetrique, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France.

Published: August 2017

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the characterization of complex sonographic adnexal masses discovered in women during pregnancy.

Study Design: The study population comprised 31 pregnant women (median age: 32 years (range: 19-42); mean gestation age of 16 weeks) referred to our institution for MR imaging for characterization of an adnexal mass discovered incidentally during routine ultrasound (US) for other indications. The population comprised of 31 women, with 36 adnexal lesions (mean size: 103mm [range: 20-290]), of which 27 were benign and 9 were malignant masses. Prospective US and MR reports were reviewed to determine the presence of a benign or malignant lesion. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) blinded to the final outcome, retrospectively evaluated the MR images using the criteria based on the AMR-S and classified the lesion as benign or malignant. The reference standard was surgical pathology or at least a 1-year imaging follow-up.

Results: Prospective US and MR imaging correctly identified the diagnosis in 27/36 (75%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.9%-86.2%) and in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions, respectively. MR imaging with AMR-S allowed a correct diagnosis in 32/36 (88.9%) (95% CI: 74.6%-95.6%) of lesions for R1 and in 30/36 (83.3%) (95% CI: 68.1%-92.1%) of lesions for R2. The sensitivities and specificities of MR imaging using the MR AMR-S were 100% (95% CI: 70.1%-1000%) for both readers and 85.1% (95% CI: 67.5%-94%) and 77.7% (95% CI: 59.2%-89.4%) for R1 and R2, respectively. No malignancy was classified as benign using MR criteria. The reproducibility between the two readers was almost perfect, with a kappa of 0.914.

Conclusion: MR imaging is highly accurate for the characterization of complex adnexal masses incidentally discovered during pregnancy.

Clinical Relevance: MR imaging can accurately characterize adnexal masses in pregnancy and could be useful in opting for expectant management until delivery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adnexal masses
16
benign malignant
12
imaging
9
complex adnexal
8
masses pregnancy
8
imaging characterization
8
characterization complex
8
population comprised
8
32/36 889%
8
889% 95%
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!