Purpose: Although S-1 based chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer has generally been accepted in Japan, discontinuations of treatment have been reported due to grade 3 or more adverse events. The present randomized phase II study was conducted to test whether alternate-day administration of S-1 would be comparably efficient and reduce adverse events compared with conventional daily administration in the first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Methods: 132 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to 1:2 ratios to receive treatment with daily at a standard dose of 80 mg/m/day or alternate-day administration group received S-1 on 4 days a week. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary end points were safety, overall survival, time to treatment failure (TTF), disease control rate, and response rate.

Results: The 6-month PFS rate of the alternate-day administration group was 20.9% and failed to show significant difference from the pre-specified threshold at 15% (p = 0.117), whereas that of the daily administration group was 39.1% and significantly higher than the threshold (p = 0.001). The hazard ratio of the alternate-day administration group compared with the daily administration group was 1.753 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-2.68, p = 0.010). With regard to OS, the hazard ratio of the alternate-day administration group compared with the daily administration group was 1.487 (95% CI 0.97-2.29, p = 0.072). The median TTF were 4.2 and 2.8 months in the daily and alternate-day administration group, respectively (p = 0.007).

Conclusion: The alternate-day administration of S-1 was not recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5677054PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1157-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

alternate-day administration
32
administration group
32
advanced gastric
20
gastric cancer
16
daily administration
16
administration
12
administration s-1
12
patients advanced
12
randomized phase
8
phase study
8

Similar Publications

Comparative analysis of oral iron therapy regimens in premenopausal women with iron deficiency anemia.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Fahrettin Kerim Gokay Street, Kadikoy, 34722, Istanbul, Turkey.

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is prevalent among women of reproductive age. Treatment aims to replenish iron stores and normalize hemoglobin levels, with oral iron therapy being the preferred route in most cases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and side effects of three common oral treatment regimens in premenopausal women with IDA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neuropathic pain is the crucial dose-limiting side effect of paclitaxel in chemotherapy patients that negatively impacts the quality of life and survival. Currently, no effective treatment option is available. Aprepitant, a well-established chemotherapy antiemetic performing neurokinin-1 receptor antagonism, shows analgesic effects in some pain models.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Not Available].

Ugeskr Laeger

October 2024

Gynækologisk Obstetrisk Afdeling D, Odense Universitetshospital.

Iron deficiency and anaemia affect premenopausal women's quality of life. Daily oral iron supplements are standard treatment, causing gastrointestinal side effects, which could be overcome by an alternate-day dosing regimen. In this review, we compare dosing strengths and frequencies in trials: Twice-daily doses of 160 mg of elemental iron increases the ferritin- but not the haemoglobin level significantly and is poorly tolerated compared to 60-80 mg elemental iron taken daily or every other day, in mild to moderate anemia, although evidence for severe anaemia is limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: About 80% of children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) have relapses. Of these children, half will relapse frequently, and are at risk of adverse effects from corticosteroids. While non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications prolong periods of remission, they have significant potential adverse effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Fasting: A Complex, Double-Edged Blade in the Battle Against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Cardiovasc Toxicol

December 2024

Department of Central Laboratory, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 44, Xiaoheyan Road, Dadong District, Shenyang, 110042, China.

In recent years, there has been a surge in the popularity of fasting as a method to enhance one's health and overall well-being. Fasting is a customary practice characterized by voluntary refraining from consuming food and beverages for a specified duration, ranging from a few hours to several days. The potential advantages of fasting, including enhanced insulin sensitivity, decreased inflammation, and better cellular repair mechanisms, have been well documented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!