Background: The postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and postdural puncture backache (PDPB) are well-known complications of spinal anesthesia. There are some attempts to reduce the frequency of complication such as different design of the spinal needles.

Aims: The primary outcome of this study is to compare the incidence of PDPH between 26-gauge Atraucan and 26-gauge Quincke spinal needles in elective cesarean operations. The severity of symptoms, the incidence of backache, technical issues, and comparison of cost of needles are secondary outcomes.

Materials And Methods: After Investigational Review Board approval, a randomized, prospective, double-blinded study was designed in 682 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II women having elective cesarean operations under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into two groups as 26-gauge Atraucan Group A ( = 323) and 26-gauge Quincke spinal needles Group Q ( = 342). All patients were questioned about backache 1 week later. Differences between categorical variables were evaluated with Chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared by Student's -test for two independent groups. A two-sided < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups in all demographic data. The one attempt success rate of the dural puncture in Group A (70,58%) and in Group Q (69.3%) was similar ( > 0.05). The incidence of PDPH was 6.5% in Group A and 4.9% in Group Q ( > 0.05). The epidural blood patch was performed to the three patients in Group A and five patients in Group Q who had severe headache ( > 0.05). The incidence of PDPB was 4.33% versus 2.04% in Group A and Group Q ( > 0.05).

Conclusions: The incidence of complication rates and technical handling characteristics did not differ between two groups. Quincke needle is cheaper than Atracaun needle, so it can be a cost-effective choice in obstetric patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490108PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.194591DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

postdural puncture
12
26-gauge atraucan
12
26-gauge quincke
12
quincke spinal
12
spinal needles
12
group
10
puncture headache
8
atraucan 26-gauge
8
obstetric patients
8
spinal anesthesia
8

Similar Publications

Background: Lumbar puncture (LP) is a critical diagnostic procedure in the evaluation of neurological diseases. Although considered safe, complications such as post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), back pain, subdural hematoma or venous sinus thrombosis may still occur. Whether the use of antiplatelet therapy (APT) increases the risk of complications after LP, remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care delivery can lead to inadequate peripartum pain management and associated adverse maternal outcomes. An epidural blood patch (EBP) is the definitive treatment for moderate to severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH), a potentially debilitating neuraxial anesthesia complication associated with significant maternal morbidity if undertreated. In this nationwide study, we examine the racial and ethnic disparities in the inpatient utilization of EBP after obstetric PDPH in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after an accidental dural puncture (ADP) is a common complication in obstetric analgesia. It has been proposed that inserting an intrathecal catheter (ITC) after an ADP may reduce PDPH incidence and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch (EBP). Our primary objective was to assess if the insertion of an ITC after an ADP reduces the incidence of PDPH in obstetric patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is still mostly regarded a minor complication after lumbar puncture. In the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD)-3 headaches lasting longer than 14 days or persisting after epidural blood patch (EBP) are not even considered. We illustrate that there may be many patients with persisting headaches and a large disease burden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Complications of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in thoracoabdominal aortic procedures.

Can J Surg

December 2024

From the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Krzyzaniak, Vergouwen, Van Essen, Nixon); the Department of Surgery, Section of Vascular Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Krzyzaniak, Moore, Rommens); the Department of Cardiac Sciences, Section of Cardiac Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (McClure); the Calgary Aortic Program, Calgary, Alta. (McClure, Moore, Rommens); the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. (Nixon, Jadavji).

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage is used to reduce spinal cord ischemia (SCI) in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic procedures. Recent literature has found high rates of complication associated with CSF drainage, which has led to changes in practice. The aim of this study was to investigate rates of CSF drain-related complications in patients undergoing a thoracoabdominal aortic procedure with perioperative placement of a CSF drain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!