A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment for class II and III correction on posterior airway space : Comparison of mono- and bignathic osteotomies. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare how different orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatments affect the posterior airway space (PAS) in patients with Class II and Class III malocclusions.
  • Researchers analyzed pre- and postsurgical X-rays of 53 Caucasian patients divided into four groups based on their malocclusion type and surgical method, measuring changes at six levels of the PAS.
  • Results showed significant increases in PAS measurements, especially in Class II patients undergoing monognathic surgery, while bignathic surgery resulted in less change in both Class II and III patients, highlighting the importance of considering PAS alterations in treatment planning.

Article Abstract

Objectives: Comparison of treatment effects on the posterior airway space (PAS) in patients treated with combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment.

Methods: Pre- and postsurgical lateral cephalograms of 53 (34 females, 19 males) Caucasian patients were analyzed using a customized set of measurements. According to malocclusion (Class II or III) and surgical approach (either monognathic or bignathic), patients were allocated into four groups. PAS was assessed from cranial to caudal at six levels (P1-P6). Paired t tests were used for intragroup and t tests for independent samples for intergroup comparisons. Results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results: In patients treated for Class II malocclusion, PAS retropalatally (P1 level) almost remained unchanged, whereas measurements at levels P2-P6 showed a mean increase ranging from approximately 2-5.5 mm. Significant changes were most pronounced in monognathic Class II patients (group 1) at levels P2-P4 with mean values ranging from approximately 3.7-5.5 mm. In patients treated for Class III malocclusion (groups 3 and 4), measurements at the P1 level almost remained unchanged in patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery (group 3), whereas the same measurements exhibited significant increase (>6 mm) in patients treated with bignathic surgery (group 4).

Conclusions: Bignathic surgery led to smaller changes of pharyngeal depth in Class II and III patients than monognathic surgery. Alterations of the PAS due to orthognathic surgery should be considered during orthodontic and presurgical treatment planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00056-017-0101-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

class iii
12
combined orthodontic-orthognathic
8
posterior airway
8
airway space
8
patients treated
8
bignathic surgery
8
effects combined
4
orthodontic-orthognathic treatment
4
treatment class
4
iii correction
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!