Trial of Electrical Direct-Current Therapy versus Escitalopram for Depression.

N Engl J Med

From the Service of Interdisciplinary Neuromodulation, Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Laboratory of Neurosciences (LIM-27) (A.R.B., B.S.-J., L.B., L.V.M.A., R.F., W.F.G.), and the Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation, University Hospital (A.R.B., A.H.M., B.S.-J., L.B., M.L.M., R.A.F., B.P.V., B.S.N., L.V.M.A., L.B.R., R.C., L.C.T., R.F., P.A.L., I.M.B.), University of São Paulo, São Paulo; and the Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (F.F.).

Published: June 2017

Background: We compared transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of depression.

Methods: In a single-center, double-blind, noninferiority trial involving adults with unipolar depression, we randomly assigned patients to receive tDCS plus oral placebo, sham tDCS plus escitalopram, or sham tDCS plus oral placebo. The tDCS was administered in 30-minute, 2-mA prefrontal stimulation sessions for 15 consecutive weekdays, followed by 7 weekly treatments. Escitalopram was given at a dose of 10 mg per day for 3 weeks and 20 mg per day thereafter. The primary outcome measure was the change in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score (range, 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more depression). Noninferiority of tDCS versus escitalopram was defined by a lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decreased score that was at least 50% of the difference in the scores with placebo versus escitalopram.

Results: A total of 245 patients underwent randomization, with 91 being assigned to escitalopram, 94 to tDCS, and 60 to placebo. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean (±SD) decrease in the score from baseline was 11.3±6.5 points in the escitalopram group, 9.0±7.1 points in the tDCS group, and 5.8±7.9 points in the placebo group. The lower boundary of the confidence interval for the difference in the decrease for tDCS versus escitalopram (difference, -2.3 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.3 to -0.4; P=0.69) was lower than the noninferiority margin of -2.75 (50% of placebo minus escitalopram), so noninferiority could not be claimed. Escitalopram and tDCS were both superior to placebo (difference vs. placebo, 5.5 points [95% CI, 3.1 to 7.8; P<0.001] and 3.2 points [95% CI, 0.7 to 5.5; P=0.01], respectively). Patients receiving tDCS had higher rates of skin redness, tinnitus, and nervousness than did those in the other two groups, and new-onset mania developed in 2 patients in the tDCS group. Patients receiving escitalopram had more frequent sleepiness and obstipation than did those in the other two groups.

Conclusions: In a single-center trial, tDCS for the treatment of depression did not show noninferiority to escitalopram over a 10-week period and was associated with more adverse events. (Funded by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo and others; ELECT-TDCS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01894815 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1612999DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

versus escitalopram
12
confidence interval
12
tdcs
10
escitalopram
9
tdcs oral
8
placebo
8
oral placebo
8
sham tdcs
8
tdcs versus
8
lower boundary
8

Similar Publications

This paper aims to present a Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) macro %BBIplus, offering estimation and visualisation methods for the Bang's Blinding Index (BBI) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with various designs. We developed the SAS macro programme %BBIplus to facilitate the implementation of BBI. This user-friendly programme allows for easy and rapid estimation and visualisation of BBI across different scenarios, including pairwise comparison RCTs with two arms, double-dummy design RCTs with three arms and factorial design RCTs with four arms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

MDMA is a promising adjunct to psychotherapy and has well-known abuse liability, although less than other amphetamine analogs. While the reinforcing dopamine (DA)-releasing properties of MDMA are on par with methamphetamine (METH), MDMA is a far more potent serotonin (5-HT) releaser, via the 5-HT transporter (SERT). MDMA-mediated 5-HT release in a major reward center, the nucleus accumbens (NAc), drives prosocial behaviors via 5-HTR activation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often experience chronic abdominal pain and bowel habit changes, with a heightened risk of depression and anxiety compared to the general population. Methods Using TriNetX data from 61 U.S.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of add-on transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial.

Brain Stimul

August 2024

Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Background: The effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on major depressive disorder (MDD) was not confirmed.

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of tACS as an add-on treatment for the symptoms of depression and to understand how tACS affects brain activity.

Methods: The 4-week, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial was performed from January 29, 2023 to December 22, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!