Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary food waste management systems.

Bioresour Technol

Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia; Manufacturing Flagship, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Clayton 3168, Australia.

Published: January 2018

Municipal food waste (FW) represents 35-45% of household residual waste in Australia, with the nation generating 1.6Tg annually. It is estimated that 91% of this FW ends up in landfill. This study used life cycle assessment to determine and compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary FW management systems for two real-life jurisdictions; incorporating the complete waste service and expanding the system to include inert and garden waste. Although, no system exhibited a best ranking across all impact categories, FW digestion based systems were all revealed to have a lower global warming potential than composting and landfilling systems. Mechanical biological treatment, anaerobic co-digestion, and home composting all demonstrated the lowest environmental impacts for two or more of the environmental impact categories assessed. The assessment included market and technological specific variables and uncertainties providing a framework for robust decision making at a municipality level.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.070DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

environmental impact
12
life cycle
8
cycle assessment
8
compare environmental
8
impact contemporary
8
food waste
8
management systems
8
impact categories
8
waste
5
assessment compare
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!