Objective: To present comparative study aims to assist the practitioner to choose between behavior modification (BM) techniques, pharmacologic sedation (NO-O alone or combined with midazolam 0.5 mg/ kg) or routine general anesthesia (GA) for the most successful approach in enabling pediatric dental care.
Study Design: Dental records of 56 children treated in a university dental clinic between 2006-2016 were reviewed, and data on age, gender, required treatment (amalgam restorations, composite restorations, pulpotomy, and stainless steel crowns [SSC]), treatment approaches and therapeutic success at final follow-up were retrieved.
Results: Treatment under GA had the best success rates compared to both BM and pharmacologic sedation. NO-O alone had a 6.1-fold greater risk of failure compared to NO-O+midazolam (p- <0.008). Amalgam restorations had a 2.61-fold greater risk of failure than SSC (p- <0.008).
Conclusions: The GA mode yielded significantly greater success than the NO-O mode alone. There were no significant differences in success rates between GA and combined midazolam 0.5 mg/kg+NO-O. When choosing restoration material, it is important to remember the high success rate of SSC compared to amalgam restoration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-41.4.308 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!