We present commentary focused on the theoretical implications of Hardy et al.'s (2017) study of elite (E) and super-elite (SE) UK athletes. Athlete developmental experiences are first discussed, and we consider how Hardy et al.'s findings fit with extant and emerging theory regarding motivation and experiences of adversity. We then focus on athlete characteristics and propose a complementary theory-based interpretation of Hardy et al.'s findings based on the idea that SE athletes may be more focused on agency than E athletes. We consider this proposition in light of theory and empirical research addressing the agency and communion theoretical distinction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.02.001 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!