Comorbidity Assessment in Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Can Imaging Techniques (Fludeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomographic Computed Tomography and Contrast-Enhanced Computed tomography) Provide Additional Information?

Purpose: This study evaluated the role of imaging staging examinations (positron-emission tomographic computed tomography [PET/CT] and contrast-enhanced computed tomography [ceCT]) for the assessment of the comorbidity status of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A binary null hypothesis was drafted: 1) imaging staging examinations do not augment knowledge about the comorbidity status of patients with OSCC and 2) there is no difference between PET/CT and ceCT in this regard.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was selected to address the research question. Patients with histologically confirmed OSCC who underwent whole-body staging by PET/CT or ceCT from 2012 through 2015 were considered for inclusion according to predefined criteria. Data collection was performed by the review of patient charts and histology, radiology, and nuclear medicine reports. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was chosen to quantify comorbidity and was calculated before and after staging and then compared. The type of imaging staging examination (PET/CT or ceCT) served as the predictor variable and the CCI was determined as the primary outcome variable. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed for the variable scale. The significance level was set at a P value less than or equal to .05.

Results: The sample was composed of 178 patients (71 women, 107 men; average age, 64.2 yr) of whom 109 (61%) underwent PET/CT and 69 (39%) underwent ceCT staging. The pre- and post-staging CCI notably differed. Neither imaging technique showed superior results.

Conclusion: Relevant and otherwise covert comorbidities can be found by the performance of imaging staging examinations. This enables clinicians to better assess the peri-therapeutic risk and prognosis of patients with OSCC. Therefore, a detailed evaluation of incidental findings on imaging studies is warranted and recommended.