How Should Resident Physicians Respond to Patients' Discomfort and Students' Moral Distress When Learning Procedures in Academic Medical Settings?

AMA J Ethics

Professor of medical education and administration and of clinical surgery at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, and serves as the senior associate dean for health sciences education, and serves as executive vice president physician for educational affairs at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Published: June 2017

In this scenario, a medical student, Lauren, experiences moral distress because she feels that learning to perform a procedure on a patient who requested not to be used for "practice" puts her own interests above the patient's. Lauren might also worry that the resident physician is misrepresenting her abilities. The resident physician could help alleviate Lauren's distress and align her interests with the patient's by more clearly explaining the training situation to the patient and seeking the patient's approval. Lauren might also manage the situation by assuring the patient of the resident's supervisory role. This article argues that trainees should have the opportunities to practice procedures and difficult conversations in simulated settings and that institutions should support a culture of "speaking up" to ensure patients' and learners' safety.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.ecas1-1706DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

moral distress
8
interests patient's
8
resident physician
8
resident physicians
4
physicians respond
4
respond patients'
4
patients' discomfort
4
discomfort students'
4
students' moral
4
distress learning
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!