A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of fentanyl on the induction dose and minimum infusion rate of propofol preventing movement in dogs. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how fentanyl affects the amount of propofol needed to induce anesthesia and maintain minimal movement in dogs when subjected to painful stimuli.
  • Six healthy Beagle dogs were tested using a crossover design, with varying doses of fentanyl administered before induction with propofol.
  • Results showed that both doses of fentanyl led to significant reductions in the required induction dose and maintenance rates of propofol compared to a control group, highlighting fentanyl's effectiveness in anesthetic procedures.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of fentanyl on the induction dose of propofol and minimum infusion rate required to prevent movement in response to noxious stimulation (MIR) in dogs.

Study Design: Crossover experimental design.

Animals: Six healthy, adult intact male Beagle dogs, mean±standard deviation 12.6±0.4 kg.

Methods: Dogs were administered 0.9% saline (treatment P), fentanyl (5 μg kg) (treatment PLDF) or fentanyl (10 μg kg) (treatment PHDF) intravenously over 5 minutes. Five minutes later, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg, followed by 1 mg kg every 15 seconds to achieve intubation) and maintained for 90 minutes by constant rate infusions (CRIs) of propofol alone or with fentanyl: P, propofol (0.5 mg kg minute); PLDF, propofol (0.35 mg kg minute) and fentanyl (0.1 μg kg minute); PHDF, propofol (0.3 mg kg minute) and fentanyl (0.2 μg kg minute). Propofol CRI was increased or decreased based on the response to stimulation (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 mA), with 20 minutes between adjustments. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and presented as mean±standard error.

Results: ropofol induction doses were 6.16±0.31, 3.67±0.21 and 3.33±0.42 mg kg for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. Doses for PLDF and PHDF were significantly decreased from P (p<0.05) but not different between treatments. Propofol MIR was 0.60±0.04, 0.29±0.02 and 0.22±0.02 mg kg minute for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. MIR in PLDF and PHDF was significantly decreased from P. MIR in PLDF and PHDF were not different, but their respective percent decreases of 51±3 and 63±2% differed (p=0.035).

Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: Fentanyl, at the doses studied, caused statistically significant and clinically important decreases in the propofol induction dose and MIR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.11.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fentanyl induction
8
induction dose
8
minimum infusion
8
infusion rate
8
propofol
8
pldf phdf
8
fentanyl
7
dose minimum
4
rate propofol
4
propofol preventing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!