Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To determine the effect of fentanyl on the induction dose of propofol and minimum infusion rate required to prevent movement in response to noxious stimulation (MIR) in dogs.
Study Design: Crossover experimental design.
Animals: Six healthy, adult intact male Beagle dogs, mean±standard deviation 12.6±0.4 kg.
Methods: Dogs were administered 0.9% saline (treatment P), fentanyl (5 μg kg) (treatment PLDF) or fentanyl (10 μg kg) (treatment PHDF) intravenously over 5 minutes. Five minutes later, anesthesia was induced with propofol (2 mg kg, followed by 1 mg kg every 15 seconds to achieve intubation) and maintained for 90 minutes by constant rate infusions (CRIs) of propofol alone or with fentanyl: P, propofol (0.5 mg kg minute); PLDF, propofol (0.35 mg kg minute) and fentanyl (0.1 μg kg minute); PHDF, propofol (0.3 mg kg minute) and fentanyl (0.2 μg kg minute). Propofol CRI was increased or decreased based on the response to stimulation (50 V, 50 Hz, 10 mA), with 20 minutes between adjustments. Data were analyzed using a mixed-model anova and presented as mean±standard error.
Results: ropofol induction doses were 6.16±0.31, 3.67±0.21 and 3.33±0.42 mg kg for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. Doses for PLDF and PHDF were significantly decreased from P (p<0.05) but not different between treatments. Propofol MIR was 0.60±0.04, 0.29±0.02 and 0.22±0.02 mg kg minute for P, PLDF and PHDF, respectively. MIR in PLDF and PHDF was significantly decreased from P. MIR in PLDF and PHDF were not different, but their respective percent decreases of 51±3 and 63±2% differed (p=0.035).
Conclusions And Clinical Relevance: Fentanyl, at the doses studied, caused statistically significant and clinically important decreases in the propofol induction dose and MIR.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2016.11.002 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!