Controversy exists regarding the involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) during motor imagery (MI) and also regarding the differential somatotopic representation of motor execution (ME) and mental simulation of movement, that is, MI within M1. Although some research reported clear M1 involvement during MI without overt motor output, others did not. However, possible somatotopic representation between execution and imagery has not been clearly investigated to date. The aim of the present study was to aid in the resolution of this controversy by investigating the possible involvement of M1 during MI, and the differential, within M1, somatotopic representation between execution and imagery by quantitatively assessing different location markers such as activation peak and center of mass as well as intensity differences between the two tasks in case of with and without the overlap between the two representations. Forty-one healthy volunteers participated in two functional MRI runs of mouth-stretching ME and MI tasks. Our findings suggest the clear involvement of M1 (BA 4) during MI with lower signal intensity compared with ME, and further showed distinct centers for each representation along the y-axis (anteroposterior plane), with MI showing more involvement of the anterior sector of M1 (BA 4a), whereas ME recruited more of the posterior sector (BA 4p). These results parallel the pioneering findings of a functional distinction between BA 4a and BA 4p, where BA 4a is more involved in the cognitive aspects of MI, whereas BA 4p is more related to executive function, promoting the idea of distinctive somatotopic mapping between execution and imagery within M1 sectors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000825 | DOI Listing |
J Neurophysiol
December 2024
Department of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2DG, United Kingdom.
Human body movements are supported by a somatotopic map - primary motor cortex (M1) - that is found along the precentral gyrus. Recent evidence has suggested two further motor maps that span the lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) and the precuneus. Confirmation of these maps is important, as they influence our understanding of the organisation of motor behaviour, for example by revealing how visual- and motor-related activity interact.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
November 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Background And Objectives: The surgical resection of insular gliomas is associated with a high rate of postoperative morbidity as they grow close to descending motor fibers and lenticulostriate arteries. It is believed that intraoperative perforator infarctions are the determining factor for patients' postoperative outcome, while the majority of patients with intraoperative ischemic events do not develop postoperative motor deficits. This study aims to evaluate whether navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and nTMS-based fiber tracking could be valuable for the preoperative assessment of patients with insular gliomas.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCereb Cortex
August 2024
Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 380, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland.
medRxiv
August 2024
Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
The notion of a somatotopically organized motor cortex, with movements of different body parts being controlled by spatially distinct areas of cortex, is well known. However, recent studies have challenged this notion and suggested a more distributed representation of movement control. This shift in perspective has significant implications, particularly when considering the implantation location of electrode arrays for intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCell Rep
August 2024
Department of Molecular & Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Electronic address:
Atypical sensory processing is common in autism, but how neural coding is disrupted in sensory cortex is unclear. We evaluate whisker touch coding in L2/3 of somatosensory cortex (S1) in Cntnap2 mice, which have reduced inhibition. This classically predicts excess pyramidal cell spiking, but this remains controversial, and other deficits may dominate.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!