Background: The European Society for Medical Oncology published in 2015 its Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) for cancer medicines. Our objective was to evaluate the association between Israel's national reimbursement decisions regarding novel cancer drugs, prior to the availability of ESMO-MCBS, and the later published ESMO-MCBS scores.
Research Design And Methods: ESMO-MCBS scores were obtained retrospectively for the cancer drugs that were candidates for reimbursement in Israel in 2013-2015 and were categorized to 'highest benefit' (ESMO-MCBS 4-5 or A) 'medium benefit' (3 or B) and 'lowest benefit' (0-2 or C). The reimbursement decisions were accessed and compared with the categorized ESMO scores.
Results: ESMO-MCBS score was available for 19/22 drugs approved for reimbursement and 15/16 non-approved drugs. 58% of the approved drugs gained a 'highest benefit' score and 37% were 'medium benefit'. 87% of the non-approved drugs had 'lowest benefit' scores. Median score for approved drugs was 4 vs. 1 for the non-approved (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The Israeli decisions regarding reimbursement of novel cancer drugs, demonstrated concordance with ESMO-MCBS scores. Incorporation of ESMO-MCBS data in reimbursement deliberations could assist in framing the appropriate use of the limited resources to deliver effective and affordable cancer care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2017.1343146 | DOI Listing |
Clin Dermatol
December 2024
Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA. Electronic address:
The evolution of healthcare payment models has profoundly influenced clinical practices and physician decision-making. While fee-for-service (FFS) models incentivize procedural volume, systems based on Relative Value Units (RVUs) have introduced standardized metrics to compensate physicians based on care complexity and workload. As corporations increasingly own healthcare, financial incentives such as RVUs and procedural quotas raise ethical concerns.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Health Econ
December 2024
Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands.
Background: Health economic evaluations require cost data as a key input, and reimbursement policies and systems should incentivize valuable care. Subfertility is a growing global phenomenon, and Dutch per-treatment DRGs alone do not support value-based decision-making because they don't reflect patient-level variation or the impact of technologies on costs across entire patient pathways.
Methods: We present a real-world micro-costing analysis of subfertility patient pathways (n = 4.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
December 2024
Department of Psychiatry, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar (BD) and major depression disorder (MDD) are severe psychiatric disorders that are challenging to treat, often leading to treatment resistance (TR). It is crucial to develop effective methods to identify and treat patients at risk of TR at an early stage in a personalized manner, considering their biological basis, their clinical and psychosocial characteristics. Effective translation of theoretical knowledge into clinical practice is essential for achieving this goal.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFValue Health
December 2024
Australian Genomics, Melbourne, Australia; Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Objectives: The multifaceted ways in which genomics can be valuable to clinicians, patients, families, and society are important for informing prioritisation decisions by policy makers. This study aims to develop a standardised, cumulative and preference-weighted Genomic Utility Valuation (GUV) on a scale 0-100%.
Methods: A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) was conducted with experts involved in policy, clinical, research, and consumer advocacy leadership in Australia for the valuation of policy priority indicators of genomic utility.
J Health Econ Outcomes Res
December 2024
Milliman (United States).
Rising oncology healthcare costs have led to value-based care reimbursement models that coordinate care and improve quality while reducing overall spending. These models are increasingly important for traditional Medicare and other payers. To compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs), AE-associated excess costs, and total cost of care (TCOC) of 3 cohorts receiving first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!