Objective: To quantify distress in men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS).

Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional design, we assessed men through questionnaire and investigator-designed questions.

Results: RP patients worried more about cancer spread than AS patients. RP patients were influenced by friends for treatment decision, whereas AS patients were influenced by urologists. RP group report declines in intimacy and instrumental. AS men worried more about future health and dying than post-RP men.

Conclusion: Fear of disease progression may be a motivating factor in choosing RP. AS patients adhere to their treatment decision in spite of distress.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2017.1342733DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active surveillance
8
radical prostatectomy
8
patients influenced
8
treatment decision
8
patients
6
psychological distress
4
distress lifestyle
4
lifestyle disruption
4
disruption low-risk
4
low-risk prostate
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!